The Rise and Fragmentation of Modern National Pride: A Global Sociological Study

National identity remains the primary cohesive force holding sovereign nation-states together and shaping their relationships within the broader international system.¹ At its core, national pride represents the positive affect that individuals feel toward their country as a result of this identity.¹ However, as the geopolitical and economic landscape undergoes profound transformations, the nature, expression, and intensity of national pride are fracturing along distinct partisan, generational, and geographic lines.²

While traditional political theory often treats national pride as a uniform sentiment, contemporary empirical data reveal a highly complex phenomenon.¹ To understand this evolution, it is critical to analyse the sociological mechanisms driving national pride, compare its shifting dynamics across major global regions, and examine how domestic polarisation and rising global interdependence are redefining what it means to be proud of one’s nation.²

Defining the Spectrum: Civic Patriotism, Symbolic Attachment, and Nationalism

To analyse trends in national pride, a clear conceptual distinction must be made between patriotism and nationalism.¹ Though both arise from an attachment to the nation-state, their behavioural and psychological outcomes diverge significantly.¹

The philosophical division is captured in the work of political theorist Maurizio Viroli, who notes that love of country can be generous, compassionate, and intelligent, but it can also be exclusive, deaf, and blind.⁷ This basic distinction separates patriotism—a noble national attachment that breeds pride and leads to good works—from nationalism, which is unrefined and breeds bigotry.⁸ While patriotism denotes a pride in a nation’s history, culture, and democratic structures, nationalism denotes a feeling of inherent superiority over other nations.⁸

Sociological research further refines these concepts by identifying different modes of attachment within the citizenry ⁸:

• Civic Patriotism: Centred on a commitment to democratic institutions, the rule of law, and the shared political community.⁹ It values the democratic traditions that make a country worth improving, recognising both achievement and failure in the national story.⁹
• Symbolic Patriotism: A focus on the nation’s core ideals and values, such as freedom, equality, and civil liberties.⁸ Symbolic patriots tend to support political participation and are willing to criticise their government to force it to live up to its ideals.⁸
• Blind Patriotism and Nationalism: An uncritical, unreflective attachment to national symbols and policies.⁸ This mode is highly chauvinistic, often demands unquestioning loyalty, and frequently views out-groups—such as immigrants or foreign adversaries—with hostility.⁷

This conceptual distinction is measured empirically through different scales of national pride.¹ Sociological assessments often distinguish between a “Specific Achievement Scale,” which measures positive feelings toward ten distinct national accomplishments (including democracy, economic success, social security, and science), and a “General National Pride Scale,” which has a harder edge.¹ The General Scale contains items asserting that one’s country is superior to others and places national allegiance over moral judgments.¹

These distinct dimensions of pride affect state stability in contrasting ways.¹¹ Across diverse economic and cultural systems, general national pride is the single strongest predictor of a citizen’s willingness to fight for their country during times of conflict.¹¹ However, while national attachment and cultural pride increase defence willingness, highly chauvinistic nationalism can lead to militaristic escalation, whereas a lack of baseline civic pride undermines democratic resilience and social cohesion.⁹

Sociological Drivers: Traditionalism, Economic Inequality, and Values Shifts

The intensity and character of national pride are heavily shaped by long-term shifts in socioeconomic organisation and existential security.¹³ To explain these macro-level dynamics, sociologists point to the transition of values across different developmental phases and the deliberate role of the state in cultivating national sentiments.¹³

The World Values Survey and the Modernisation Thesis

According to the World Values Survey, global human values primarily vary along two major dimensions: “traditional versus secular-rational values” and “survival versus self-expression values”.¹³ Traditional values emphasise religiosity, respect for authority, absolute obedience, and high levels of national pride.¹³ Secular-rational values place far less emphasis on these elements, viewing authority and national symbols critically.¹³

This values shift is driven by the “revised theory of modernisation,” which states that as societies experience modernisation and increased existential security, their priorities shift predictably.¹³ The transition from agrarian to industrial societies provides a dramatic increase in existential security, moving populations from traditional toward secular-rational values.¹³ Subsequently, the transition from industrial to knowledge economies expands individual agency, driving a shift from survival values to self-expression values.¹³

As self-expression values gain prominence, the nature of national pride changes.¹³ Citizens in post-industrial knowledge societies tend to reject the passive acceptance of state authority and the unreflective national pride common in traditional, survival-oriented societies.¹³ Instead, they demand individual liberties, express tolerance for diversity, and adopt a conditional, highly critical view of the state.¹³ This explains why advanced, secular-rational societies, particularly in Western Europe, report lower average levels of general national pride than more traditional, developing societies.¹²

The Diversionary Theory of Nationalism

While modernisation naturally reshapes values from the bottom up, states also actively work to cultivate national pride from the top down, often using it as a defensive mechanism.¹⁴ The “diversionary theory of nationalism” maintains that states generate and amplify nationalist sentiments to respond to the threat of domestic unrest posed by high levels of economic inequality.¹⁴

High inequality threatens the status quo by exposing class disparities and encouraging lower-income citizens to mobilise for redistribution.¹⁴ To defuse this “ticking bomb,” the state utilises its powerful institutional machinery—including public education, national holidays, military parades, and media regulations—to instil a sense of deep, horizontal comradeship that transcends actual inequalities.¹⁴

By framing the nation as a unified family, the nationalist narrative works to obscure the extent of domestic exploitation and preempt calls for systemic change.¹⁴ This is supported by empirical findings showing that states with higher levels of economic inequality tend to inculcate more nationalism in their populations.¹⁴

Alternatively, Shayo’s identity model suggests that rising economic inequality depresses the social status of the poor, inducing lower-income individuals to cling more closely to the nation.¹⁴ For these citizens, national pride offers an alternative, high-status collective identity that offsets their low economic standing, making them highly receptive to state-led patriotic narratives.¹⁴

The Decline of General Pride in Western Democracies

In mature Western democracies, particularly the United States and several European nations, the baseline national pride that once underpinned civic life has experienced a severe decline, fracturing along political and generational lines.²

The American Context: Slumping Pride and Patriotism

Data from major national polls in mid-2025 illustrate the scale of this decline in the United States.² A Gallup survey recorded a historic low, with only 58% of U.S. adults reporting that they are “extremely” (41%) or “very” (17%) proud to be an American—a drop of nine percentage points from the previous year and a notable erosion from the near-unanimity observed at the start of the twenty-first century.² This is supported by YouGov tracking data, which showed that the share of Americans describing themselves as proud to be American fell from 83% in mid-2024 to 68% in mid-2025, with those identifying as “very patriotic” dropping to just 31%.¹⁶

This erosion has altered how Americans view their fellow citizens.¹⁶ When asked to describe the contemporary American public, 50% labeled most Americans as “selfish” (up from 28% in 1948), 39% as “spoiled,” 37% as “intolerant,” and 34% as “reactionary”.¹⁶ This shift in public perception reflects a broader decline in social trust, driven by the belief that the “American Dream” is increasingly out of reach.¹⁶ Only 36% of Americans believe the national dream is personally attainable, a figure that drops to 28% for home renters and 27% for adults under 45.¹⁶

The Partisan Divide

The decline in American pride is heavily polarised.² The sharp drop observed in 2025 was primarily driven by Democrats and political independents, whose national pride reached record lows following the transition to the second Trump administration.²

This partisan division is not unique to the United States.¹⁸ Across a wide range of surveyed nations, individuals who do not support the current governing party are significantly more likely to report a total lack of pride in their country.¹⁸ In Hungary, citizens who do not support Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s ruling Fidesz party are 22 percentage points more likely to say they are not proud of their country.¹⁸ This indicates that in polarised environments, national pride is no longer a stable, baseline attachment to the state but is highly conditional, fluctuating based on which party holds executive power.¹⁰

The Generational Fracture

An equally significant division is generational.² Each successive generation of Americans is substantially less likely than the previous one to express national pride.²

Among Generation Z (born after 1996), only 41% express being extremely or very proud to be an American, compared to 58% of Millennials, 71% of Generation X, 75% of Baby Boomers, and 83% of the Silent Generation.² This generational gap is especially pronounced among young Democrats: only 24% of Gen Z Democrats report feeling proud of their country, while 32% state they have little to no pride at all.²

This generational alienation is fueled by a combination of material and ideological factors.² Younger cohorts have come of age during a period of acute economic instability, rising housing costs, and systemic gridlock.¹⁶ Furthermore, having been educated in a more globalised, multicultural environment, younger generations are highly sensitive to systemic inequality, democratic backsliding, and historical injustices, making them less receptive to traditional, uncritical forms of state patriotism.²

Voices of Discontent: Why Citizens are Losing Pride

To understand why a growing portion of the global public explicitly states they are not proud of their country, one must look to the specific, localised grievances raised by citizens in their own words.¹⁸ These qualitative criticisms, collected across high- and low-income nations, centre on several core structural failures.¹⁸

Leadership, Corruption, and Democratic Backsliding

For many citizens, a lack of pride is tied directly to the actions and perceived character of their political leaders.¹⁸ In Nigeria, where a large share of the population expresses no national pride, a young respondent stated simply that the leaders have messed the entire country up.¹⁸ In Hungary, a 76-year-old man criticised the politicians sitting in parliament, accusing them of fattening their livers with exorbitant salaries while ignoring the struggles of ordinary pensioners.¹⁸

This political alienation is frequently accompanied by a deeper concern over the decay of democratic systems.¹⁸ This criticism is prominent in mature democracies, where citizens perceive their governance systems as increasingly unresponsive.¹⁸ In France, a 60-year-old man lamented that the country now has a democracy that is not working, public services that are deteriorating, and a system that has devolved into a plutocracy.¹⁸ In Canada, some citizens expressed the extreme view that the nation is losing its core freedoms, with one respondent warning that Canada is no longer a true democracy and risks becoming a dictatorship.¹⁸

Economic Insecurity and Stagnation

Persistent economic hardship, inflation, and structural unemployment are major drivers of pride erosion.¹⁸ In Turkey, where the economy has suffered severe inflationary shocks, a 51-year-old man described a state of total desperation, noting that economic mismanagement has left citizens in need of bread on charity shelves, with unaffordable rents and rampant unemployment.¹⁸

In South Africa, a 52-year-old woman highlighted the burden of rising taxes on the poor, while another South African citizen explained that he had lost all hope because parents cannot find work and the state’s R350 unemployment grant is insufficient to cover basic needs, such as school transport for children.¹⁸ Even in wealthier nations, economic anxiety is prominent: a 25-year-old American woman expressed deep depression over knowing she will likely never be able to afford her own home because housing prices continue to rise rapidly.¹⁸

 ──> ──> [Loss of Faith in National Institutions] ──>

Social Integrity, Immigration, and Sovereignty

Changing demographic patterns and national policies on immigration are also major sources of friction, though the nature of the grievance varies widely.¹⁵ In Australia and Sweden, some citizens feel that traditional national values have been eroded by poor immigration policies and weak politicians.¹⁸ A Swedish man summarised this sentiment by stating he was proud of everything in Sweden except its immigration policies.¹⁸

Conversely, in the United Kingdom and the United States, other citizens express a lack of pride because they believe their nations are not welcoming enough to outsiders.¹⁸ Critics point to a lack of commitment to integration in the UK, and the perceived persecution of immigrants in the US, highlighting detention centres as a source of national shame.¹⁸

Furthermore, the perceived loss of national sovereignty to supranational organisations is a recurring theme in Europe.¹⁸ In Sweden, some citizens express resentment that the European Union is prioritised over the nation-state, with others stating their pride evaporated when Sweden abandoned its traditional independence to join NATO.¹⁸

The Rise of Selective Pride and Regional Pluralism

As general, uncritical national pride declines, it is being replaced by “selective pride”—where citizens find pride in specific, non-political aspects of their nation, such as its people, diversity, or cultural achievements.⁵

Global Variations in Selective Pride

The sources of selective pride vary across cultural zones, reflecting distinct historical pathways and societal values.¹³

• Diversity and Multiculturalism: Pointed to as a primary source of pride in Canada and Indonesia, with roughly three-in-ten citizens in each country emphasising their multicultural society.¹⁵ However, this pride in diversity is politically divided; in countries like Canada, Australia, Brazil, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States, citizens on the political left are significantly more likely to cite diversity as a point of pride than those on the right.¹⁵
• Arts, Culture, and History: Highly prioritised in European nations.⁵ The French (26%) and Italians are most proud of their art and culture, while the Greeks (37%) emphasise their long historical legacy.²⁰
• Human Character and Solidarity: Prominent in Latin America and East Asia.⁵ In Argentina, 35% of respondents cite the empathy, solidarity, and warmth of their fellow citizens, describing them as highly supportive and united.⁵ In Japan, where 41% mention the Japanese people as their primary source of pride, citizens emphasise specific cultural traits such as respectfulness, honesty, modesty, and diligence.¹⁵

Case Study: The Pluralistic and Non-Polarised Pride of India

The state of national pride in India presents a unique sociological case.²⁰ Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, national confidence has risen, with Pew surveys showing that 79% of Indian respondents view Modi favourably and seven-in-ten believe India’s global influence has recently grown.²¹

However, when asked in an open-ended format what exactly makes them proud of their country, Indians display an extraordinarily diverse and fragmented range of responses, with no single theme dominating the national consciousness.²⁰

  ├── 31% Agnostic / Non-Response (Highest Globally)
  ├── 3% Negative Sentiment (Extremely Low)
  └── Diverse Sources of Pride:
        ├── People & Fellow Indians (10%)
        ├── Arts, Culture, Economy, Political System (8% each)
        ├── General Identity (7%)
        ├── Political Leadership (6%)
        └── Religion (5%)

This fragmentation is unique compared to other surveyed nations, where the top source of pride typically accounts for at least 20% of all responses.²⁰ Furthermore, India stands out for its lack of political polarisation regarding national identity.²⁰ While Western nations show a massive partisan gap in national pride, in India, there is virtually no difference in negative sentiment between supporters of the ruling BJP and its allies (1%) and those who do not identify with the ruling coalition (4%).²⁰

This suggests that India’s diverse and pluralistic society maintains a highly localised, personal, and decentralised relationship with national identity, which remains remarkably resilient to the deep partisan cleavages observed in Western democracies.²⁰

State Nationalism and Historical Restoration in China

In contrast to the declining and fragmented pride in Western democracies, modern Chinese nationalism represents a highly potent, state-led force that serves as a primary source of political legitimacy and social cohesion.²⁴

Historical Roots and the Century of Humiliation

Modern Chinese nationalism emerged in the late Qing dynasty in response to China’s defeat in the First Sino-Japanese War and the subsequent incursions by foreign powers.²⁶ This sense of civilizational collapse initiated a profound intellectual debate about the survival of the Chinese nation within a Westphalian system dominated by predatory imperial powers.²⁶ Modern Chinese nationalism was built on a dual foundation: a deep pride in China’s historical role as the cultural centre of the world, and a bitter resentment over the “Century of Humiliation” (1842–1945), during which the nation suffered severe losses of sovereignty.²⁵

Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the opening of the Chinese economy under Deng Xiaoping, and the domestic political crises of 1989, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) systematically revived nationalism.²⁴ Lacking the traditional ideological appeal of classical Marxism, the state implemented extensive patriotic education campaigns designed to instil national values, highlight past foreign victimhood, and celebrate the country’s economic modernisation.²⁴ Today, this narrative of historical restoration and great power status has largely replaced communist ideology as the most powerful legitimating force for CCP rule.²⁴

Collective and Interdependent Pride

The expression of pride in China is structurally different from that in Western, individualistic cultures.²⁸ Cross-cultural linguistic analyses reveal that while Americans express high frequencies of individual and personal pride, Chinese populations express significantly more collective, national, and relational pride.²⁸ In China, national pride is directly tied to collective achievements—such as economic growth, scientific breakthroughs, or hosting major global events like the Olympic Games.²⁴

Furthermore, while Western observers often view Chinese nationalism as a state-manufactured product, experts note that modern Chinese pride contains a highly genuine, populist component.²⁵ This populism is reactive, mobilising quickly whenever the public perceives that the West is attempting to humiliate China or interfere in its internal affairs.²⁵

This reactive pride has manifested in widespread online activism, consumer boycotts, and public demonstrations following events such as the accidental bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade in 1999, the Hainan Island aircraft collision in 2001, and foreign protests during the Olympic torch relays.²⁵ This potent combination of state-directed and popular nationalism makes Chinese national pride a highly resilient, inward-looking force that holds the country together in a turbulent geopolitical environment.²⁴

The 2026 Paradox: The Resurgence of Global Solidarity

While the rise of populist movements and economic protectionism over the past decade suggested a long-term triumph of inward-looking nationalism, the political landscape of 2026 has revealed a surprising paradox: a pronounced resurgence of global solidarity and international cooperation.³

According to the 2026 Global Solidarity Report, public support for internationalism has rebounded sharply after several years of steady decline.⁶ Across 31 countries surveyed, support for global solidarity rose on multiple key indicators, representing a significant reversal of the downward trend observed between 2024 and 2025.⁶

  ├── Global Citizenship Identity: 40% of the global public (Up from 33% in 2025)
  ├── Financial Commitment: >40% support using taxes to solve global problems
  └── Supranational Authority: ~66% support enforcement powers for global issues

This rebound cuts across major demographic groups, showing support increases across educational levels, income brackets, and generations.⁶ Generation Z has recorded the largest increase, overtaking Millennials as the most internationalist generation.⁶ High-income households have also shown a strong willingness to back international financial contributions, and low-income respondents have moved toward supporting enforcement powers for international institutions.⁶

Sociologists attribute this shift to the visible strains on the international order.⁶ Rather than rendering global cooperation obsolete, the compounding pressures of geopolitical conflict, climate disruption, trade tensions, and economic anxiety have made global interdependence impossible for the public to ignore.³

Crucially, this rise in global solidarity does not represent an eradication of national pride.⁶ Rather, researchers note that identifying as a citizen of the world does not conflict with patriotism.⁶ Instead, the public mood is shifting toward a multi-layered identity, where individuals maintain a warm, civic attachment to their homeland while simultaneously recognising their role in a broader global community.¹

Conclusion

The evolution of national pride in the contemporary era reveals a global landscape characterised by deep fragmentation and structural divergence.² In mature Western democracies, the traditional, unifying model of national pride has fractured under the weight of political polarisation, regional economic inequality, and generational divides.²

For many citizens in these societies, national pride has become highly conditional, fluctuating based on executive leadership and economic security.² Conversely, in major Asian powers like China, national pride remains a highly unified, state-led, and popular force, deeply rooted in civilizational heritage, economic success, and historical narratives of restoration.²⁴

Yet, the defining development of 2026 is the realisation that national pride and global solidarity are not mutually exclusive.¹ As the limits of isolationist policies become clear in the face of systemic global crises, the public is increasingly embracing a layered model of identity.³ The most resilient societies are likely to be those that reject both exclusive, blind nationalism and detached cosmopolitanism.¹ Instead, the path forward lies in cultivating a confident, self-reflective civic patriotism—one that values local democratic institutions and remains compatible with international cooperation.¹

Disclaimer

This sociological and geopolitical report is based on cross-national public opinion surveys, database tracking, and academic research compiled up to and including the year 2026.³ All statistical figures, percentage breakdowns, and qualitative statements cited represent the recorded sentiments of surveyed populations at their respective times of measurement.¹⁶ Public opinion is highly dynamic and subject to rapid alteration in response to changing macroeconomic conditions, legislative developments, executive leadership transitions, and international events.³ This document is compiled exclusively for informational, educational, and analytical purposes and does not represent formal political, economic, or policy advocacy.

References

1. National Pride: A Cross-national Analysis Tom W. Smith and Lars Jarkko National Opinion Research Center/ University of Chicago G – GSS, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://gss.norc.org/content/dam/gss/get-documentation/pdf/reports/cross-national-reports/CNR19%20National%20Pride%20-%20A%20cross-national%20analysis.pdf
2. American Pride Slips to New Low – Gallup News, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://news.gallup.com/poll/692150/american-pride-slips-new-low.aspx
3. Political, Strategic, and Economic Trajectories in 2026 – TRENDS Research & Advisory, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://trendsresearch.org/insight/political-strategic-and-economic-trajectories-in-2026/
4. Global Trends For 2026 – Issues In Perspective, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://issuesinperspective.com/2026/01/global-trends-for-2026/
5. What Makes People Proud of Their Country? – Pew Research Center, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2026/02/17/what-makes-people-proud-of-their-country/
6. Survey finds rising support for global solidarity and cooperation, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.democracywithoutborders.org/43168/survey-finds-rising-support-for-global-solidarity-and-cooperation/
7. of In-Group Pride, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/aaa44bcc-e5a8-4384-bb82-28e0ac21b11b/content
8. Proud to be an American?: The Changing Relationship of National Pride and Identity | Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics – Cambridge University Press & Assessment, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-race-ethnicity-and-politics/article/proud-to-be-an-american-the-changing-relationship-of-national-pride-and-identity/5AAD8E190D5958F4A887006569C6DD53
9. Civic patriotism strengthens our democracy | The Strategist, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/civic-patriotism-makes-strengthens-our-democracy/
10. 6 facts about national pride in the U.S. – Pew Research Center, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/02/17/6-facts-about-national-pride-in-the-us/
11. Full article: Defending the national identity: exploring the links between a multidimensional national identity concept and the willingness to defend one’s country – Taylor & Francis, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09662839.2025.2540091
12. Cultural Differences on Values about Conflict, War, and Peace – WVS Database, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSPublicationsBooks.jsp?PUB=79&PUB=79
13. Inglehart–Welzel Cultural Map – WVS Database, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSContents.jsp?CMSID=Findings&title=Anna
14. Diversionary Nationalism: Economic Inequality and the Formation of National Pride | The Journal of Politics: Vol 73, No 3, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1017/S002238161100048X
15. Where are people proud of their nation’s people and diversity? – Pew Research Center, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2026/02/17/where-in-the-world-are-people-proud-of-their-nations-people-and-diversity/
16. Pride in being American has fallen in the past year – YouGov, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://yougov.com/en-us/articles/52464-pride-in-being-american-has-fallen-past-year-july-4-poll
17. Accelerating Acceptance 2025 Report – GLAAD, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://glaad.org/accelerating-acceptance-2025/
18. Where, and why, people aren’t proud of their country, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2026/02/17/where-and-why-people-arent-proud-of-their-country/
19. Where in the world are people proud of their nation’s politics and economy, and why? – Pew Research Center, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2026/02/17/where-in-the-world-are-people-proud-of-their-nations-politics-and-economy-and-why/
20. Indians are most agnostic about being proud of their country| India …, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/indians-are-most-agnostic-about-being-proud-of-their-country-101771400665328.html
21. Indians more likely to believe nation’s influence is growing: Pew survey – The Hindu, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/indians-more-likely-than-others-to-believe-indias-influence-is-growing-finds-pew-survey/article67252212.ece
22. Narendra Modi brings back pride in Indians, his ratings take a leap – Governance Now, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.governancenow.com/news/regular-story/modi-brings-back-pride-in-indians-his-ratings-take-a-leap
23. Narendra Modi – Research and data from Pew Research Center, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/politics-policy/leaders/narendra-modi/
24. The Origins of Chinese Nationalism in Twenty-First Century – Asian Institute of Research, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.asianinstituteofresearch.org/JSParchives/the-origins-of-chinese-nationalism-in-twenty-first-century
25. Nationalism in China | Council on Foreign Relations, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounders/nationalism-china
26. Chinese nationalism – Wikipedia, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_nationalism
27. Political Science Quarterly: Chinese Nationalism and Its International Orientations, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/psq/psq_spr00a.html
28. Individual Pride and Collective Pride: Differences Between Chinese and American Corpora – PMC, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8170025/
29. The Surge of Economic Nationalism in Western Europe, accessed on May 20, 2026, https://www.aeaweb.org/atypon.php?return_path=/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.33.4.128&etoc=1