Global Financial Markets and Geopolitical Outlook: Comprehensive Review for the Week Ending January 23, 2026

A Week of Fractured Narratives and Safe-Haven Flight

The trading week concluding on January 23, 2026, will likely be recorded by financial historians as a period of profound dislocation in the established correlations of the post-pandemic global economy. Markets across the United States, Europe, Asia, India, and Oceania were forced to navigate a treacherous landscape characterised by the abrupt re-emergence of high-stakes trade protectionism, a decisive fracturing of the synchronised global growth narrative, and an unprecedented flight to hard assets that saw precious metals shatter historical price ceilings.

The overarching theme of the week was “instability.” This instability was not merely a function of economic data—which remained mixed, showing “sticky” inflation alongside resilient growth—but was primarily driven by the erratic nature of geopolitical governance. The so-called “Greenland Incident,” wherein U.S. President Donald Trump threatened punitive tariffs on European allies in a transactional dispute over the Arctic territory, served as a potent catalyst for volatility.¹ Although these threats were later walked back, the psychological scar remained visible in the risk premiums assigned to European equities and the rapid depreciation of the U.S. dollar against real assets.

In the United States, the major equity indices posted their second consecutive week of losses, a streak not seen since mid-2025.¹ The market exhibited a stark bifurcation: the industrial and cyclical components of the Dow Jones Industrial Average suffered heavily, dragged down by a catastrophic 17% collapse in semiconductor giant Intel ², while the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite managed to eke out gains on the back of the “Magnificent Seven” and the enduring artificial intelligence investment thesis.

Europe found itself in the crosshairs of the new trade war rhetoric. The STOXX 600 index snapped a multi-week winning streak as investors aggressively sold down positions in export-dependent sectors such as luxury goods and automobiles, fearing that the “Greenland” threats were merely a prelude to a broader dismantling of transatlantic free trade.³

Asia presented a divergent picture. Japan’s Nikkei 225 remained resilient, supported by a weakening Yen even as the Bank of Japan signalled a hawkish shift in its inflation outlook.⁴ In stark contrast, India experienced a market “bloodbath,” with the Sensex and Nifty indices capitulating under the weight of relentless foreign capital outflows and renewed corporate governance concerns surrounding the Adani Group.⁵

Oceania reflected the global tension between commodity strength and monetary tightness. Australia’s ASX 200 was buttressed by surging gold miners, while New Zealand’s NZX 50 suffered its worst week in a year due to an inflation shock that reignited fears of further interest rate hikes.⁶

Perhaps the most significant signal came from the commodity markets. Gold futures approached the psychological $5,000 per ounce barrier, and silver surpassed $100 per ounce for the first time in history.¹ This parabolic move, occurring simultaneously with a decline in the U.S. dollar, suggests a structural shift in global capital allocation: a move away from sovereign fiat debt and toward non-counterparty stores of value.

This report provides an exhaustive, granular analysis of these developments. It dissects the week’s price action through the lenses of macroeconomic data, sector rotations, and geopolitical risk premiums, offering a comprehensive record of a defining week in global finance.

The Macro-Geopolitical Framework: Trade Wars and Metal Mania

To understand the specific equity movements of the week, one must first deconstruct the macro-geopolitical environment that acted as the primary driver of asset pricing. The week was less about earnings multiples and more about the “risk-free” rate and the geopolitical risk premium.

The “Greenland” Tariff Shock: Anatomy of a Market Event

The week began with a geopolitical tremor that fundamentally altered the risk appetite of global institutional investors. Reports emerged early in the week that the U.S. administration was actively considering the imposition of severe tariffs on a range of European imports. The stated leverage for these tariffs was a diplomatic dispute regarding the status of Greenland.¹

For the past several decades, global markets have operated under the assumption of a relatively stable, rules-based international trading order, particularly between the United States and the European Union. The mere threat of tariffs over a territorial dispute shattered this assumption, reintroducing “tail risk” into valuation models for multinational corporations. The market’s reaction was swift and mechanical:

• Risk-Off Sentiment: European equities, particularly those in the German DAX (automobiles) and French CAC 40 (luxury goods), sold off immediately as algorithms repriced the cost of goods sold (COGS) and potential revenue hits from U.S. market exclusion.
• The Reversal: Mid-week, President Trump appeared to de-escalate the situation, ruling out military action and retracting the immediate threat of new tariffs.⁸ He backed off the threat after discussions with European allies, which reportedly reduced tensions.
• The Linger Effect: Despite the reversal, the volatility premium remained. The “whipsaw” nature of the policy—threat followed by retraction—taught investors that trade policy is now highly volatile and transactional. This uncertainty acts as a tax on valuation; investors demand a higher equity risk premium to hold assets that could be devalued by a tweet or a press conference.

The Historic Surge in Precious Metals

The most durable signal from the week was the unprecedented capital flow into precious metals. This was not a standard inflation hedge; it was a “regime change” hedge.

• Gold’s Ascent: Gold futures traded up 1.4% on Friday alone, setting a fresh all-time high of approximately $4,980 per ounce.¹ Intra-day trading saw the metal come within $10 of the $5,000 milestone.
• Silver’s Breakout: Silver futures outperformed gold on a relative volatility basis, surging 6.5% to top $100 an ounce for the first time in history, trading around $102.60.¹

Insight: The simultaneous surge in gold and silver, occurring alongside a 0.8% drop in the U.S. dollar index ¹, indicates a “debasement fear.” Investors are not just hedging against consumer price inflation (which data shows is relatively stable at 2.7% ¹⁰); they are hedging against systemic instability in the U.S. Treasury market and the weaponisation of the U.S. dollar. The move to $5,000 gold implies that major institutional allocators (sovereign wealth funds, central banks) are aggressively increasing their weighting of non-sovereign assets.

The Energy Market Renaissance

Crude oil prices also participated in the “real asset” rally. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude futures rose 3% to settle at $61.15 a barrel.¹ This move was driven by a specific geopolitical catalyst: President Trump’s warning regarding an “armada” moving towards Iran.¹¹

This rhetoric reintroduced a “war premium” into energy markets. For the past year, oil markets had been lulled into complacency by rising non-OPEC supply. The renewed tension in the Strait of Hormuz reminded traders that a significant percentage of global oil transit remains vulnerable to geopolitical disruption. This spike in oil prices acted as a tailwind for the Energy sector across global equity indices, providing a hedge for portfolios otherwise bleeding from industrial and financial losses.

United States Equity Markets: Bifurcation and Tech Resilience

The performance of United States equity markets for the week ending January 23, 2026, can be characterised by a distinct lack of breadth and a deepening divergence between the “haves” (AI technology) and the “have-nots” (legacy cyclical industries). The shortened trading week, due to the Martin Luther King Jr. Day holiday, condensed trading volumes and exacerbated volatility, leading to the second consecutive week of losses for major indices.

Market Indices Performance and Technicals

The major benchmarks struggled to find direction, oscillating between the relief of tariff de-escalation and the dread of poor corporate guidance.

Table 1: Key U.S. Indices Performance (Week Ending Jan 23, 2026)

Source: ¹

The S&P 500 finished the week fractionally lower, effectively flatlining. The index is currently consolidating below the psychological 7,000 barrier. The failure to break out, despite the “January Effect” seasonality, suggests that the market is awaiting clarity on the Federal Reserve’s rate path.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average was the notable underperformer, shedding 285 points on Friday. This index, being price-weighted, is susceptible to large moves in high-priced components. However, this week’s drag was primarily fundamental, driven by the collapse in industrial sentiment.

The Nasdaq Composite showed relative resilience, closing higher on Friday (+0.3%). This divergence highlights the persistent “safety trade” within equities: when macro uncertainty rises, investors flock to the cash-rich, secular growth stories of Big Tech.

The Russell 2000, representing small-cap stocks, experienced a sharp reversal on Friday, falling 1.8%. Despite being up 7.5% year-to-date, this week’s action served as a warning. Small-cap stocks are highly sensitive to interest rates, and with the 10-year Treasury yield holding above 4.2% ¹, the cost of capital remains a severe headwind for these smaller, often debt-reliant companies.

Sectoral Deep Dive: Winners and Losers

Energy (+2.95%): The energy sector was the clear winner of the week.¹³ As oil prices rebounded on geopolitical fears, exploration and production (E&P) companies saw inflows. Investors used this sector as a proxy hedge against the rising geopolitical tension in the Middle East.

Basic Materials (+2.83%): Tracking the historic surge in gold and silver, the materials sector rallied.¹³ Miners of precious metals saw their margins expand significantly as the underlying commodity prices outpaced input costs (energy and labour).

Financial Services (-2.53%): The financial sector was the worst performer.¹³ The Q4 earnings season for banks began with a whimper rather than a bang. Net Interest Margins (NIM) are under pressure as the yield curve remains inverted or flat. Furthermore, regional banks like USCB Financial (USCB) dropped over 6% after missing both revenue and earnings estimates.¹⁴ USCB reported operating EPS of $0.44 (missing the $0.50 forecast) and revenue of $17.55 million (missing the $26.34 million estimate). While they showed loan growth, the earnings miss reignited fears about the profitability of the regional banking model in a “higher-for-longer” rate environment.

Real Estate (-2.26%): Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) sold off as bond yields failed to break down meaningfully.¹³ The sector remains inversely correlated to the 10-year Treasury yield; until rates drop, real estate valuations remain capped.

Corporate Spotlight: Intel and the Semiconductor Crisis

The most significant single-stock event of the week was the implosion of Intel Corp (INTC), which sank 17% on Friday.¹

• The Catalyst: Intel issued a disastrous outlook for the current quarter. Management cited severe “supply constraints” and warned that supplies could hit a low point in Q1.
• The Mechanism: On the investor call, executives revealed that finished goods inventory had declined to just 40% of its peak level.² This forced the company into a “hand-to-mouth” supply management approach. This phrase is anathema to supply chain managers; it implies a total lack of buffer and an inability to meet customer demand surges.
• The Implication: This selloff dragged down the entire semiconductor sentiment, with the exception of AI-focused chips. It highlights that the legacy chip market (PCs, servers) is still struggling with the aftershocks of the post-pandemic supply glut and subsequent over-correction. Intel’s pain stands in sharp contrast to the AI boom, suggesting the chip recovery is K-shaped.

The “Magnificent Seven” Divergence

While Intel collapsed, the “Magnificent Seven” demonstrated why they remain the market’s backbone.

• Microsoft (MSFT): Advanced +3.45%.²
• Nvidia (NVDA): Rose +1.60%.²
• Meta Platforms (META): Gained +1.77%.²

Investors are essentially treating these companies as “defensive growth.” Their exposure to the secular trend of Artificial Intelligence allows them to grow earnings even if the broader economy (GDP) slows down. This week proved that in times of uncertainty, capital concentrates in the highest quality, most liquid names.

Economic Data: The “Sticky” Reality

The economic data released this week painted a picture of an economy that is cooling but not fast enough to warrant immediate, aggressive rate cuts.

• Inflation: The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for December held steady at an annual rate of 2.7%, unchanged from November.¹⁰ Core inflation (excluding food and energy) was 2.6%. The PCE price index (the Fed’s preferred gauge) rose 0.2% month-over-month, with an annual rate of 2.8%.¹⁵
• Labour Market: Initial jobless claims rose slightly by 1,000 to 200,000.¹⁵ This is a historically low number, indicating that employers are hoarding labour.
• Interpretation: With inflation stuck near 2.7-2.8% and the labour market tight, the Federal Reserve has little political cover to cut rates aggressively. This “higher for longer” reality is what capped the S&P 500’s upside this week.

European Equity Markets: The Tariff Shadow

Europe’s equity markets served as the epicentre of the week’s geopolitical anxiety. The region’s heavy reliance on exports to the United States makes it uniquely vulnerable to the protectionist rhetoric espoused by the U.S. administration.

Market Performance and the “Greenland” Factor

The pan-European STOXX 600 index fell 0.9% for the week, closing around 596.14.³ This decline snapped a multi-week winning streak. The primary driver was the threat of tariffs linked to the Greenland dispute. Even though the threats were retracted, the market began to price in a permanent “Trade War Risk Premium.”

Table 2: Key European Indices Performance Trends

Sector Analysis: Luxury and Industrials Under Siege

The threat of U.S. tariffs caused an immediate repricing in sectors that export heavily to America.

• Luxury Sector: French luxury giants, often used as a proxy for global trade health, suffered. LVMH fell 0.7%, Kering dropped 1.8%, and L’Oréal declined 0.3%.¹⁶ The logic is simple: if the U.S. imposes tariffs, the price of these goods rises for American consumers, crushing demand in the world’s largest consumer market.
• Automotive and Chemicals: German heavyweights struggled. BASF, the chemical giant, slipped 1.7% after flagging a projected profit decline for 2025.³ Maersk, the shipping bellwether, fell 2.8%, reflecting fears that trade barriers would reduce the physical volume of shipping containers moving across the Atlantic.³

The Energy and Tech Counter-Narrative

Despite the gloom, two sectors provided pockets of strength:

• Technology: Ericsson surged 12% ³ after reporting a profit beat. This, combined with gains in ASML (+7% earlier in the week) ¹⁷, confirms that the 5G and data centre infrastructure build-out is a global phenomenon that transcends trade politics.
• Energy (FTSE 100): The UK’s FTSE 100 showed resilience, slipping only marginally (-0.07% on Friday).¹⁸ The index is heavily weighted towards “old economy” energy and mining stocks. Shell (+0.6%) and BP (+1.6%) rallied alongside crude oil prices.¹⁹ This “value” orientation allowed the UK market to act as a defensive haven relative to the Eurozone.

Economic Data: Divergence in the Core

Macroeconomic data highlighted a widening gap between the Eurozone’s two largest economies:

• Germany: Preliminary PMIs exceeded expectations, suggesting the manufacturing recession may be bottoming out.³
• France: In contrast, the French services sector unexpectedly fell into contraction.³ This divergence complicates the European Central Bank’s (ECB) policy path, as one core economy improves while the other deteriorates.

Asian Equity Markets: Diverging Monetary Paths

Asian markets offered a study in contrasts, driven by divergent monetary policy expectations and local structural issues.

Japan: The BOJ’s Hawkish Hold

The Nikkei 225 ended the week with a modest gain of 0.2-0.3% ⁴, closing around 53,846. The market’s focus was squarely on the Bank of Japan (BOJ).

• The Decision: The BOJ kept its key interest rate unchanged at 0.75%.⁴
• The Signal: Despite the hold, the bank raised its core inflation forecasts for fiscal years 2025 and 2026. One hawkish board member even dissented in favour of a rate hike.¹⁵
• Market Impact: This “hawkish hold” signals that the era of ultra-loose monetary policy is ending. However, the Japanese Yen (JPY) weakened slightly after the announcement (a “sell the news” reaction).²¹ A weaker Yen historically boosts the Nikkei (dominated by exporters like Toyota), explaining the index’s positive performance despite the prospect of higher rates.

China and Hong Kong: The Stimulus Wait

The Hang Seng Index (HSI) in Hong Kong rose 0.45% on Friday ²² but finished the week down 0.4% overall.²²

• Trade Surplus: China reported a record trade surplus of nearly $1.2 trillion for 2025.¹⁰ While this demonstrates the competitiveness of Chinese manufacturing (particularly in EVs and solar), it is politically toxic. Such a massive surplus invites protectionism from the U.S. and Europe, adding to the trade war narrative.
• Corporate Movers: Tech giants Alibaba (+2.3%) and Xiaomi (+3%) rallied on company-specific news (Alibaba planning to list its chip unit T-Head; Xiaomi’s buyback program).²² These gains helped offset broader concerns about the sluggish Chinese property market.

South Korea: The AI Memory Boom

South Korea’s KOSPI outperformed its peers, climbing 0.8% on Friday.⁴ As the home of major memory chip manufacturers (Samsung, SK Hynix), the Korean market is a direct beneficiary of the AI data centre build-out. Unlike Intel’s logic-chip struggles, the demand for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) remains insatiable, buoying the Korean index.

Indian Equity Markets: A Valuation Reset

The Indian stock market experienced a severe correction, decoupling from the relatively benign performance of other Asian peers. The week was characterised by aggressive selling, termed a “bloodbath” by local commentators, as the market grappled with valuation concerns and foreign outflows.

The Scale of the Selloff

On Friday alone, the BSE Sensex crashed 769.67 points (-0.94%) to settle at 81,537.70.⁵ The broader Nifty 50 dropped 241.25 points (-0.95%) to close at 25,048.65.⁵

• Wealth Destruction: The decline wiped out approximately Rs 6.72 lakh crore (approx. $80 billion USD) in market capitalisation in a single session.⁵
• Technical Breakdown: The Nifty 50 slipped below its 200-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA), a key technical support level that often defines the long-term trend.⁵ This breakdown signals that the market structure has shifted from “buy on dips” to “sell on rallies.”

The Drivers of the Crash

• Foreign Institutional Investor (FII) Exodus: FIIs have been net sellers for 13 consecutive sessions.²³ This relentless selling is driven by the relative valuation gap. With the Sensex trading at high multiples and the U.S. 10-year Treasury offering a “risk-free” 4.24% yield, global allocators are rotating capital out of emerging markets and back into developed market debt.
• The Adani Factor: The Adani Group, a massive conglomerate with significant index weighting, faced renewed selling pressure. Adani Ports was the top loser on the Sensex, plunging 7.52%, while Adani Enterprises hit a fresh 52-week low.⁵ Governance concerns and high debt levels continue to make investors jittery about this group.
• Currency Woes: The Indian Rupee hit a fresh record low of 91.99 against the U.S. Dollar.²³ A falling currency reduces the dollar returns for foreign investors, creating a feedback loop of selling.
• Sectoral Weakness: The selloff was broad-based. Axis Bank fell 2.72%, IndusInd Bank dropped, and Reliance Industries dragged the index lower.⁵ The weakness in financials and industrials points to concerns about a slowing domestic credit cycle.

Oceania Equity Markets: Two-Speed Economies

The markets in Australia and New Zealand highlighted the divergence between resource-rich economies and those struggling with stubborn inflation.

Australia (ASX 200): The Resource Safety Net

The S&P/ASX 200 ended the week slightly lower (-0.03% to -0.14% range depending on the data source) but managed a recovery on Friday, rising 0.13%.²⁴

• The Bull Case (Miners): The Materials sector was the standout, rising 1.5% for the week.⁶ This was entirely driven by the gold rush. Gold miners Regis Resources surged 10.29%, and Ramelius Resources jumped 7.97%, both hitting multi-year highs.²⁴ As gold nears $5,000, these miners are printing cash, providing a massive buffer for the Australian index.
• The Bear Case (Banks): Financials fell 1.4% for the week.⁶ Australian banks are highly leveraged to the domestic housing market. With bond yields rising, the risk of mortgage defaults or slowing credit growth is pricing into bank stocks.
• Tech Volatility: Life360 (a location-sharing app) skyrocketed 27.76% on Friday ²⁴, while defence tech firm DroneShield fell 5.5%.²⁴ This shows that even within sectors, stock selection is critical; investors are rewarding earnings beats (Life360) and punishing valuation excesses (DroneShield).

New Zealand (NZX 50): The Inflation Shock

The NZX 50 suffered its worst week in over a year, falling 0.8%.⁶

• The Trigger: Inflation data came in “hotter than predicted”.⁷
• The Consequence: The market had priced in aggressive rate cuts from the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ). This data shattered that thesis, suggesting rates may need to stay restrictive to prevent the economy from overheating.
• The Casualties: Interest-rate sensitive stocks like Infratil (-2.8%) and Mercury NZ (-1.3%) sold off. The a2 Milk Co fell 2.7%, hit by the double whammy of rate fears and concerns over Chinese consumer demand for its dairy products.⁷

Conclusion and Strategic Outlook

The week ending January 23, 2026, served as a stark reminder that financial markets do not operate in a vacuum. The interplay between Geopolitics (Trade Wars), Monetary Policy (Sticky Inflation), and Market Structure (Tech Concentration) created a perfect storm of volatility.

Key Takeaways for Investors:

1. The “Safety” Pivot: The historic breakout in Gold and Silver suggests that the “smart money” is actively hedging against systemic risks that standard equity/bond portfolios cannot address. The inverse correlation between the Dollar and Gold has broken; both can rise (or fall) based on different drivers, but currently, Gold is winning the “trust” battle.
2. The AI Shield: The resilience of the “Magnificent Seven” (Microsoft, Nvidia, Meta) proves that the AI investment theme is the only secular growth story strong enough to withstand macro headwinds. However, this concentration is also a risk; if AI sentiment turns, the market has no other support pillars.
3. Emerging Market Caution: The “bloodbath” in India and the fragility in China suggest that Emerging Markets are facing a difficult period of capital repatriation. Until the U.S. dollar weakens significantly or U.S. yields drop, EM equities will struggle to attract foreign flows.
4. Volatility is Back: The “Greenland” incident proved that the new U.S. administration’s policy style will be transactional and unpredictable. Investors must price in a higher “political risk premium” for all assets, particularly those with cross-border supply chains.

As we look to the week ahead, the focus will shift to the Federal Reserve. With inflation sticky and the economy cooling, the “soft landing” runway is narrowing. The market’s nervous reaction this week suggests it is bracing for a potential “no landing” or “stagflation” scenario where growth slows, but prices remain high.

Disclaimer

This research article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, legal, or tax advice. The information contained herein has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to its accuracy, completeness, or correctness. Market data, trends, and projections are subject to rapid change. Past performance is not indicative of future results. All investments involve risk, including the potential loss of principal. The analysis provided represents the views of the author as of the date of publication and may change without notice. Readers should consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. The author and the publishing institution assume no liability for any direct or consequential loss arising from the use of this article.

Reference

1. Markets News, Jan. 23, 2026: Major Indexes Post Second Straight Losing Week After Mixed Session; Intel Stock Plunges; Gold Nears $5,000, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://www.investopedia.com/dow-jones-today-01232026-11891109
2. Stock Market Today, Jan. 23: Intel’s Weak Outlook Weighs on Dow While Nasdaq Edges Higher, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://www.fool.com/coverage/stock-market-today/2026/01/23/stock-market-today-jan-23-intel-s-weak-outlook-weighs-on-dow-while-nasdaq-edges-higher/
3. Euro Area Stock Market Index (EU50) – Quote – Chart – Historical Data – Trading Economics, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://tradingeconomics.com/euro-area/stock-market
4. US Futures Slip and World Shares are Mixed as Japan Keeps Its Key Interest Rate Unchanged – DTN Progressive Farmer, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/web/ag/news/world-policy/article/2026/01/23/us-futures-slip-world-shares-mixed
5. Investors lose Rs 7 lakh crore as Sensex, Nifty resume downtrend; what’s next?, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://www.businesstoday.in/markets/stocks/story/investors-lose-rs-7-lakh-crore-as-sensex-nifty-resume-downtrend-whats-next-512705-2026-01-23
6. Australian shares end slightly higher as banks cap gains in miners – IndoPremier, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://www.indopremier.com/ipotnews/newsDetail.php?jdl=Australian_shares_end_slightly_higher_as_banks_cap_gains_in_miners&news_id=212123&group_news=IPOTNEWS&taging_subtype=Indeks%20ASX%20Australia&name=&search=y_general&q=Australian%20shares,%20ASX%20200,%20NZX%2050,&halaman=1
7. NZX50 slides most in a week since Dec 2024 amid lurking rate hike – NBR, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://www.nbr.co.nz/market-close/nzx50-slides-most-in-a-week-since-dec-2024-amid-lurking-rate-hike-fears/
8. Greenland jolts Europe into facing a changed America – The Economic Times, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/global-trends/greenland-jolts-europe-into-facing-a-changed-america/articleshow/127278923.cms
9. Thursday 22nd January 2026: Asian Markets Rise on Positive Wall Street Cues and Easing Trade Concerns, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://www.icmarkets.com.au/blog/thursday-22nd-january-2026-asian-markets-rise-on-positive-wall-street-cues-and-easing-trade-concerns/
10. Weekly Market Recap — Manulife John Hancock Investments, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://www.jhinvestments.com/weekly-market-recap
11. Morning wrap (23.01.2026) – XTB.com, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://www.xtb.com/en/market-analysis/morning-wrap-23-01-2026
12. How major US stock indexes fared Friday, 1/23/2026, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://www.kens5.com/article/syndication/associatedpress/how-major-us-stock-indexes-fared-friday-1232026/616-39a331b7-38d6-43ae-b19c-3177eab7ab1b
13. Weekly Market Update: Stocks Remain Flat as Energy Rises and Financial Services Fall, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://www.morningstar.com/markets/weekly-market-update-stocks-remain-flat-energy-rises-financial-services-fall
14. USCB Financial Q4 2025 slides reveal mixed results as stock drops 6.14% – Investing.com, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/uscb-financial-q4-2025-slides-reveal-mixed-results-as-stock-drops-614-93CH-4463471
15. Market Quick Take – 23 January 2026 – Saxo Bank, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://www.home.saxo/content/articles/macro/market-quick-take—23-january-2026-23012026
16. France Stock Market Index (FR40) – Quote – Chart – Historical Data – Trading Economics, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://tradingeconomics.com/france/stock-market
17. European shares start 2026 at record highs; tech, defence provide lift – Investing.com, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/european-shares-start-2026-by-hitting-a-record-high-4427391
18. Markets data – stock market, bond, equity, commodity prices – FT.com, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://markets.ft.com/data
19. United Kingdom Stock Market Index (GB100) – Quote – Chart – Historical Data – News, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://tradingeconomics.com/united-kingdom/stock-market
20. Asia stocks rise on tech strength; BOJ rate decision in focus, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://au.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/asia-stocks-rise-on-tech-strength-boj-rate-decision-in-focus-4219603
21. Asia FX rises as dollar nurses weekly loss; yen soft after BOJ hold – Investing.com Australia, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://au.investing.com/news/forex-news/asia-fx-rises-as-dollar-nurses-weekly-loss-yen-soft-after-boj-hold-4219650
22. Hong Kong Stock Market Index (HK50) – Quote – Chart – Historical Data – Trading Economics, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://tradingeconomics.com/hong-kong/stock-market
23. Sensex tanks 769 pts, Nifty slips below 25050 amid FII outflows – ICICI Direct, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://www.icicidirect.com/equity/market-news-list/e/sensex-tanks-769-pts-nifty-slips-below-25050-amid-fii-outflows/1667162
24. Australia stocks higher at close of trade; S&P/ASX 200 up 0.13%, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/australia-stocks-higher-at-close-of-trade-spasx-200-up-013-4461924
25. New Zealand Stock Market (NZX 50) – Quote – Chart – Historical Data – Trading Economics, accessed on January 24, 2026, https://tradingeconomics.com/new-zealand/stock-market