The Great Silence: An Exhaustive Sociological and Economic Analysis of the “Posting Zero” Phenomenon

The digital landscape is currently undergoing its most significant behavioural shift since the advent of the “Like” button in 2009. For nearly two decades, the fundamental logic of the social internet was predicated on a broadcast model: user participation was synonymous with content production. To exist online was to post—to share life updates, photographs, and opinions in a public forum. Value was generated by the volume and velocity of this output.

However, as we move through the mid-2020s, empirical data and cultural observation reveal the crystallisation of a diametrically opposed paradigm: “Posting Zero.” This phenomenon is characterised by a massive cohort of digitally native users—predominantly Gen Z and younger Millennials—who remain highly active consumers of digital content while simultaneously ceasing to produce public-facing content of their own.

This report provides a comprehensive, expert-level analysis of the Posting Zero ecosystem. It dissects the psychological underpinnings of this silence, ranging from “Context Collapse” and “Digital Footprint Anxiety” to the sophisticated avoidance behaviours of “Aura Farming.” We examine the structural deterioration of social platforms—a process termed “enshittification”—and how the pivot from social graphs to interest graphs has alienated the average user. Furthermore, we explore the sociological theories that explain this retreat, specifically the “Dark Forest” and “Dead Internet” theories, which posit that the public internet has become a hostile, bot-infested zone where silence is the only rational survival strategy. Finally, the report details the new social rituals that have replaced public posting, such as “soft launching” relationships and the use of ephemeral “Notes,” before concluding with an outlook on the future of digital human connection.

The Death of the Status Update: Phenomenology of a Silent Internet

The Paradigm Shift: From “Pics or It Didn’t Happen” to “Pics are Evidence”

To understand the magnitude of Posting Zero, one must first contextualise the era that preceded it. Between 2008 and 2016, the social internet was defined by a chaotic, unfiltered exuberance often summarised by the mantra, “Pics or it didn’t happen.” The ethos of Web 2.0 was performative participation. Users treated platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and early Twitter as digital diaries. The implicit social contract was simple: visibility equalled validity. If a user ate a meal, they posted it. If they went for a run, they shared the GPS map. If they had a fleeting thought, they broadcast it to the world.

We have now entered the era of “Posting Zero.” This term, popularised by cultural commentators like Kyle Chayka and solidified by user behaviour in late 2024 and 2025, refers to a specific mode of online existence where the user is present but effectively invisible.¹ These users have not deleted their accounts; they are not engaging in a traditional “digital detox.” Instead, they are logging in daily, scrolling for hours, watching Reels and TikToks, liking posts, and sending Direct Messages (DMs). Yet, their own public grids remain frozen in time, often displaying photos from years ago, or they have been scrubbed clean entirely to show a post count of “0”.³

The “Posting Zero” user treats social media not as a town square for public discourse—a metaphor heavily utilised by platform founders—but as a broadcast utility, a television that watches them back. The decline in personal sharing is quantifiable and stark. Studies analysing hundreds of thousands of users across 50 countries have detected a sharp drop in social media content creation, with usage shifting almost entirely toward passive consumption.² The “Town Square” has become a “Times Square”: a place to consume advertisements and spectacle, but certainly not a place to have a conversation with a friend.

The Taxonomy of the Zero User

To the untrained observer, a Posting Zero account might look inactive or abandoned. However, digital anthropologists and behavioural analysts distinguish Posting Zero from mere inactivity. The Posting Zero user is often chronically online, possessing a high degree of digital literacy and meme fluency. They are simply choosing not to leave a trace.

We can categorise the Posting Zero phenomenon into several distinct user archetypes:

The Decline of the “Global Town Square”

The rise of Posting Zero signals the final collapse of the “Global Town Square” metaphor. The Town Square relied on the premise that visibility is a virtue and that public interaction leads to community. Posting Zero suggests the opposite: that visibility is a liability—a “trap”—and that true community can only exist in private.⁶

This transition marks a move from an “Open Web” philosophy to a “Cozy Web” reality. The open web—public feeds, hashtags, viral threads—has become a hostile environment filled with noise, while the cozy web—DMs, Discords, private Stories—has become the refuge for humanity. Posting Zero is the act of locking the door to the public street and retreating into the living room.⁷ The internet has not lost its users; the users have simply gone indoors.

The Psychological Toll: The Anxiety of Perception

The retreat from public posting is not merely a change in fashion; it is a profound psychological defence mechanism. Years of living under the microscope of the “Like” button have produced a generation struggling with digital burnout, performance anxiety, and a newly identified form of stress known as “Context Collapse.”

Context Collapse and the Fragmentation of Self

One of the primary drivers of Posting Zero is the crushing weight of “Context Collapse.” In sociology, this concept describes the flattening of multiple distinct audiences into a single context.⁸

In the physical world, individuals naturally segregate their audiences. We present a different version of ourselves to our parents, our drinking buddies, our colleagues, and our romantic partners. We use different languages, body language, and humour. Social media platforms, however, force these distinct spheres to collide. When a user prepares a public Instagram post or a Tweet, they must mentally construct an “Imagined Audience” that includes all these groups simultaneously.

A post that is funny to a college friend might be alarming to a mother and unprofessional to a boss. This convergence creates an impossible bind. To post publicly is to risk alienating one segment of the audience to please another. The cognitive load required to curate a piece of content that is safe for everyone—grandmother, ex-partner, future employer, and stranger—is immense and exhausting.⁸

• The Result: Paralysis. The safest move in a game of context collapse is not to play. Users silence themselves to avoid the friction of managing conflicting identities.

Digital Footprint Anxiety and the “Permanent Stain”

We are living in the age of the “receipt.” Everything posted online is archived, indexed, screen-shotted, and potentially weaponised. Gen Z, the first generation to grow up with a complete digital record of their adolescence, has developed a deep-seated “Digital Footprint Anxiety”.¹⁰

They have witnessed the mechanisms of “Cancel Culture” where tweets from a decade ago are resurfaced to destroy reputations, jobs, and social standing.¹¹ They understand that context is rarely preserved in the digital archive. A joke made in 2015 is judged by the moral standards of 2025. This fear of the “permanent stain” drives users to silence. A post made today might be socially acceptable now, but could be deemed “cringe” or offensive in five years.

• Sanitisation Strategies: This anxiety explains why users who do have accounts often purge them. The “0 Posts” profile is a defensive posture—a way to exist on the platform without giving ammunition to the world.¹² It is an acknowledgment that in a surveillance economy, data is a liability.

The “Cringe” Factor and Aura Farming

For the younger generation, the worst possible social sin is to appear to be “trying too hard.” The culture has shifted away from the earnest, curated aesthetic of the “Millennial Pink” era toward a nihilistic, “effortless” existence. Posting on the main grid is inherently vulnerable; it says, “I care about this image, and I want you to validate it.” This vulnerability is now viewed with scepticism, often labelled as “cringe” or “cheugy”.³

This cultural shift has given rise to the concept of “Aura Farming”.¹³ To have “aura” is to possess a mysterious, cool presence that does not require external validation.

• Low Aura: The person who posts 10 stories a day documenting their lunch. They are perceived as needy and accessible.
• High Aura: The person who posts nothing, yet is known to be living an interesting life. They are perceived as secure and elusive.

Posting Zero is, in this sense, a high-status play. It signals that the user is too busy living their life to document it for an audience. It is the digital equivalent of wearing sunglasses indoors—a deliberate barrier that creates intrigue.¹³

The Comparison Trap and Doomscrolling

While users are posting less, they are not comparing less. The passive consumption of “Highlight Reels”—the curated, best moments of influencers and peers—continues to drive feelings of inadequacy. However, the response to this inadequacy has shifted. Instead of trying to compete by posting their own highlight reel (which feels fake), users are opting out of the competition entirely.³

This is inextricably linked to the phenomena of “Doomscrolling” and “Brain Rot”.¹ Users enter a catatonic state of consumption, scrolling through an endless feed of bad news, influencer flexes, and algorithmic sludge. In this state, the idea of interrupting the flow to post a picture of a sunset feels not only futile but narcissistically tone-deaf. “Who cares about my brunch when the world is burning?” becomes the dominant internal monologue.¹⁵

Structural Decay: The “Enshittification” of Platforms

The decision to stop posting is not purely internal; it is a rational, economic response to the degradation of the platforms themselves. Social media companies have fundamentally altered the architecture of the internet in ways that punish personal connection and reward algorithmic compliance.

Cory Doctorow’s “Enshittification” Cycle

The decline of user posting is a direct symptom of what author and activist Cory Doctorow calls “Enshittification”.² This theory describes the predictable lifecycle of digital platforms:

1. Stage 1: Surplus to Users. Platforms are good for users to build a network effect. They show you your friends’ posts in chronological order. They are useful and delightful.
2. Stage 2: Surplus to Customers. Once the users are locked in, the platform abuses them to make things better for business customers (advertisers). They kill the chronological feed, prioritise paid content, and harvest data aggressively.
3. Stage 3: Surplus to Shareholders. Finally, the platform abuses both users and advertisers to claw back all value for the company. The experience becomes miserable for everyone, but switching costs are too high to leave.

We are currently deep in Stage 3. The “feed” is no longer a collection of updates from friends; it is a stream of “curated ads, regurgitated trendy reels, and AI-generated slop”.² When a user opens Instagram or X, they rarely see their friends. They are seeing what the algorithm thinks will keep them addicted.

• The Impact on Posting: Why post a life update if the algorithm guarantees your friends won’t see it? If a user posts a photo of their dog, and Instagram buries it beneath 50 sponsored posts and 20 viral TikTok reposts, the user receives no engagement. High effort, zero reward. This breaks the dopamine feedback loop that sustained social media for a decade.⁴

The Shift from Social Graph to Interest Graph

The most critical structural change has been the pivot from the Social Graph to the Interest Graph.

• Social Graph: Connects people who know each other (Facebook 2010). The value comes from who you know.
• Interest Graph: Connects people to entertaining content, regardless of the source (TikTok, Instagram Reels). The value comes from what keeps you watching.¹¹

Social media is no longer “social.” It is “media.” It has become a television with infinite channels. In a media environment, there is a stark divide between “Creators” (the 1% who are professional entertainers) and “Consumers” (the 99% who watch). The middle class of social media—the average person posting their lunch—has been squeezed out. They cannot compete with the production value of professional creators, so they stop trying.³ The platform mechanics now explicitly discourage personal sharing in favour of “viral” content.

The Bot Invasion and the “Dead Internet”

The user experience is further degraded by the overwhelming presence of non-human actors. The “Dead Internet Theory” posits that a significant percentage of internet traffic and content is generated by bots.²

• The Uncanny Valley of Engagement: Users report that comment sections are filled with “identical emojis, random crypto spam, or accounts that clearly aren’t human”.³ Posting into this environment feels like shouting into a void populated by robots.
• Algorithmic Slop: The rise of AI-generated content (images, text, spam sites) has flooded the zone with low-quality noise. This “AI slop” debases the value of human content. If an AI can generate a perfect sunset or a witty caption, the human effort to do so feels devalued.¹

Theoretical Frameworks: The Dark Forest & The Reverse Turing Test

To fully grasp the magnitude of Posting Zero, we must look at the sociological theories that predicted this retreat. It is not just about annoyance with ads; it is about survival in a hostile digital ecosystem.

The Dark Forest Theory of the Internet

Coined by Yancey Strickler and expanded by Maggie Appleton, the Dark Forest Theory is the most potent metaphor for the current state of the web.⁶

• The Metaphor: In the sci-fi novel The Dark Forest by Liu Cixin, the universe is described as a dark forest. It is quiet, not because there is no life, but because speaking reveals your location to predators. To survive, intelligent life stays silent.
• The Digital Parallel: On the internet, the “predators” are advertisers, data brokers, trolls, cancel mobs, and surveillance algorithms. The “open web” (Twitter, public Instagram) is the danger zone.
• The Behaviour: To survive, humans remain silent in public (Posting Zero) and retreat to “Dark Forests”—private, encrypted, or invite-only spaces. These are Discord servers, WhatsApp groups, Slack channels, and Email newsletters.
• The Implication: The internet seems “dead” or “boring” (Posting Zero), but it is actually teeming with life; that life is just hidden from the public view. The public internet has become a “demilitarised zone” of bots and influencers, while the real internet has gone underground.⁶

The “Reverse Turing Test”

With the rise of Generative AI, humans are facing a “Reverse Turing Test.” We no longer just ask “Is this machine human?” We ask, “Am I proving that I am not a machine?”.⁶

• The Pressure: Standard social media posts (sunsets, latte art, inspirational quotes) are now easily replicated by AI. To post them is to look like a bot (an “NPC”).
• The Silence: To avoid being mistaken for “AI slop” or a “basic” algorithm-chaser, users choose silence. Silence is one of the few things AI cannot authentically replicate, as AI is designed to generate output constantly. Withholding output becomes a uniquely human assertion of agency.⁶
• Vibe Coding: When humans do post, they are beginning to use “Vibe Coding”—a way of speaking or posting that is so context-heavy, ironic, or nonsensical that an AI cannot replicate it. It is a shibboleth for humanity.¹⁷

Manifestations of the Void: New Rituals of Connection

Posting Zero does not mean the end of digital communication; it means the mutation of it. As the public feed dies, new behaviours have emerged to fill the vacuum. The energy that used to go into public posting has been redirected into specific, lower-stakes, or privacy-focused rituals.

The “Soft Launch”: Privacy as a Romantic Strategy

The era of the “Facebook Official” relationship status is dead. In its place is the “Soft Launch”.¹⁸ This behaviour perfectly encapsulates the Posting Zero ethos: it allows for expression without full exposure.

A “Soft Launch” is the subtle, gradual introduction of a partner onto social media without showing their face or tagging them. It creates a “narrative of mystery” rather than a “narrative of fact.”

Why Soft Launch?

• Protection: “Hard launching” is seen as inviting public scrutiny. If you post a face, you invite judgment on their looks, their vibe, and the relationship’s validity.
• The Breakup Buffer: If you never “hard launch” a relationship, you never have to “hard delete” it. A soft launch protects the user from the public embarrassment of a breakup. There are no photos to scrub if the partner was never fully revealed.²⁰

The Rise of “Lurking” as a Default State

“Lurking”—observing without interacting—was once considered creepy or voyeuristic. It is now the standard operating procedure for the majority of users.³

• The “Ghost Follower”: A user who follows accounts but never likes or comments. In the past, these were assumed to be bots. Now, they are likely real people who are simply “consuming” rather than “participating”.²¹
• The Logic of the Lurk: Lurking is a low-risk, high-reward strategy. You get the information and entertainment without the risk of judgment or the labour of reciprocity. It is the digital equivalent of people-watching from behind a tinted window. The aesthetic of the “Lurker” is even being romanticised in film and media as a symbol of modern alienation—the “I shoot a video of myself therefore I am” celebrity culture is being replaced by the “I watch, therefore I know” lurker culture.²²

The Pivot to Private: “Close Friends” and “Notes”

Platforms are frantically trying to adapt to Posting Zero by creating “semi-private” spaces. They realise users are leaving the town square, so they are trying to build digital living rooms.

• Instagram Notes: This feature allows users to post short, 60-character text updates that disappear in 24 hours and are only visible to mutual followers. It is a return to the “AIM Away Message” of the early 2000s.²⁴
• Why it works: It removes the “aesthetic pressure” of a photo. It feels casual, low-stakes, and intimate. It is “anti-performative.” It allows for a “pulse check”—signalling “I am alive” without demanding “Look at me”.²⁴
• Close Friends (CF): The “Close Friends” story is the compromise for the Posting Zero generation. It allows them to post “cringe,” vulnerable, or unedited content to a curated list of 20 people while keeping their main grid professional and empty. It is a manually created “Dark Forest” within a public platform.³

The Aesthetic of Nothingness: Visualising Silence

Posting Zero has developed its own visual language. The absence of content is, paradoxically, a form of content. The way a profile is constructed when it has no posts is a deliberate design choice.

The “Clean Girl” / “Mystery” Bio

When a profile has zero posts, the Bio becomes the only real estate for expression. It must do the heavy lifting of personality projection without being “loud.” Trends include:

• The One-Word Bio: “Lurking,” “Existing,” or just a specific emoji (e.g., a ghost 👻 or a black hole ⚫). This signals a refusal to define oneself for the audience.²⁵
• The Location Drop: Just the city name (e.g., “NYC” or “LDN”). It grounds the user in reality without offering details.
• The “Archive” Label: Using the bio to state “Archived” implies the user had a life, but has chosen to close the book on sharing it. It suggests maturity—”I used to post, but I grew out of it”.²⁶
• Vibe Coding in Bios: The use of specific emojis or obscure phrases that only a select in-group understands. This signals “if you get it, you get it,” reinforcing the Dark Forest exclusivity. It acts as a filter to attract the right kind of private interaction while repelling the “normies”.¹⁷

The Frozen Grid as a Museum

The “Frozen Grid” (e.g., last post: December 2021) tells a story. It often marks the moment the user “grew up,” “checked out,” or realised the game wasn’t worth playing. It serves as a digital museum. Unlike a deleted account, which implies a dramatic exit, the frozen grid implies indifference—which is the ultimate cool. It says, “I have better things to do than update this”.³

“NPC Energy” vs. “Main Character Energy”

Ironically, Posting Zero is a way to reclaim “Main Character Energy”.¹³

• NPC (Non-Playable Character): In video game terms, an NPC is a background character with programmed lines. On social media, the “NPC” is someone who follows the script, participates in every trend, uses the popular audio, and feeds the algorithm.
• Main Character: The protagonist is often mysterious, unbothered, and does not need to prove their existence to the audience. By not posting, the user forces the audience to wonder about them, flipping the power dynamic. Silence creates a vacuum that others fill with curiosity.¹³

The Industry Panic: Economic Implications of the Void

The shift to Posting Zero is an existential threat to the business model of social media, which relies on free user-generated content (UGC) to sell ads. It creates a data crisis for the entire digital economy.

The Engagement Crisis and “Dark Social”

Metrics are down. “Sends” (sharing a post via DM) has replaced “Likes” and “Comments” as the primary form of engagement. However, this data is often invisible to advertisers—a phenomenon known as “Dark Social”.²⁷

If a user sees a Nike ad, they don’t like it; they screenshot it and send it to a group chat. The platform registers this as “0 engagement,” even though the purchase intent might be high. This makes it incredibly difficult for platforms to prove their value to advertisers. The “signal” has been lost in the dark forest.

The Influencer Bubble and the “Mall with No Shoppers”

If “normies” (regular people) stop posting, the feed becomes 100% influencers and ads. This creates a “mall where no one is shopping.”

• The Authenticity Crisis: The value of Instagram was that it mixed your friends with brands. If your friends leave, you are just watching commercials. Influencers are finding themselves shouting into a room full of other influencers and bots. The “parasocial” relationship breaks down when the audience refuses to participate in the illusion.¹⁵

The “Ghost Follower” Dilemma

Brands are struggling to value influencers because follower counts no longer correlate with influence. A user with 10,000 followers might have 5,000 “ghosts.”

• Real vs. Fake Ghosts: In the past, “ghost followers” were bots. Today, they are real people who have adopted the Posting Zero lifestyle. They log in, they see the content, but they never interact. This makes engagement rates (ER) plummet across the board. Tools like IQFluence struggle to distinguish between a “dead bot” and a “Posting Zero human,” complicating marketing budgets.²¹

Future Outlook: Is This the End of Social Media?

Is Posting Zero a permanent shift or a cyclical trend? The evidence suggests a permanent bifurcation of the internet.

The “Touch Grass” Movement

Posting Zero is deeply connected to the “Touch Grass” movement—a slang term for disconnecting and engaging with physical reality.¹ As the digital world becomes more artificial (AI, bots, ads), the physical world gains a premium value. “Real life” is the new exclusive club.

• Prediction: We will see a split. The “Public Internet” will become a space for commerce, AI agents, and professional entertainment (TV 2.0). The “Social Internet” will move entirely to encrypted, private apps (WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal). The era of “Public Social Media” as a place for personal connection is likely over.¹¹

The Return to “Real Life”

Some analysts suggest that Posting Zero is the harbinger of a return to pre-2000s social norms. People will still use the internet, but as a utility (like a phone book or a library), not as a stage. The “performative self” is being retired in favour of the “experienced self.” The validation loop is moving back to face-to-face interactions.²⁹

The AI Factor

As AI becomes better at generating content, human content will become scarcer and more private. We may reach a point where any public content is assumed to be AI unless proven otherwise. In this world, silence is the only authentic human signature. Or, conversely, the only way to prove humanity will be through “Vibe Coding”—creating content so specific, weird, and nuanced that an AI couldn’t possibly have hallucinated it.¹⁷

Conclusion: The Sound of Silence

“Posting Zero” is not an act of laziness; it is an act of resistance. It is a conscious rejection of the algorithmic hamster wheel, a defence against the anxiety of surveillance, and a retreat from a public square that has been overrun by robots and salesmen.

For a decade, we believed that connection required visibility—that to be friends, we had to perform for one another. The Posting Zero generation has dismantled this lie. They have realised that true connection often requires darkness, privacy, and the freedom not to be perceived.

The internet is not dying, but the “Social Media Era”—defined by the public performance of the private self—is ending. In its place, a quieter, more guarded, and perhaps more human internet is emerging from the shadows. The grid is empty, but the DMs are full. The silence is not an absence of life; it is a sign that life has moved elsewhere, to places where the algorithm cannot follow.

Disclaimer

This report compiles analysis based on digital culture trends, sociological theories, and user behaviour patterns observed up to late 2025. It is intended for informational purposes and provides a snapshot of a rapidly confusing digital zeitgeist. The “Posting Zero” phenomenon is fluid; behaviours described herein may evolve as platforms adjust their algorithms and features. This report should not be taken as psychological or investment advice regarding social media platforms or their stocks. The interpretations of “Dark Forest Theory” and “Enshittification” are based on the works of Yancey Strickler, Maggie Appleton, and Cory Doctorow, respectively.

Reference

1. Why Gen Z’s new ‘posting zero’ trend could be more effective than …, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://uk.style.yahoo.com/why-gen-z-posting-zero-145604956.html
2. What is ‘Posting Zero’? – ThePrint, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://theprint.in/feature/what-is-posting-zero-the-internet-generation-is-growing-tired-of-social-media/2790859/
3. Is Gen Z quitting social media for good? – Cosmopolitan India, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://www.cosmopolitan.in/life/features/story/is-gen-z-quitting-social-media-for-good-1309892-2025-11-28
4. The era of posting nothing: How ‘Posting Zero’ became social media’s defining trend, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://www.indulgexpress.com/trends/2025/Dec/06/the-era-of-posting-nothing-how-posting-zero-became-social-medias-defining-trend
5. Digital burnout and the hidden cost of constant connectivity – Knews, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://knews.kathimerini.com.cy/en/comment/opinion/digital-burnout-and-the-hidden-cost-of-constant-connectivity
6. The Dark Forest and Generative AI – Maggie Appleton, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://maggieappleton.com/ai-dark-forest/
7. Inside the dark forests of the internet – LessWrong, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/9tYH3ebXtrFiR63Bx/inside-the-dark-forests-of-the-internet
8. Why Context Collapse Makes Gen Z Afraid to Post Honestly Online …, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://medium.com/@cruoxi029/why-context-collapse-makes-gen-z-afraid-to-post-honestly-online-635893019512
9. (PDF) SOCIAL MEDIA IMPLOSION: CONTEXT COLLAPSE! – ResearchGate, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354693673_SOCIAL_MEDIA_IMPLOSION_CONTEXT_COLLAPSE
10. Gen X and Gen Z Issues – Mumbai – Reema Shah, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://reemashah.net/gen-x-and-gen-z-issues/
11. Why Gen Z is Quitting Social Media in 2025 | Posting Zero Explained ‪@SakshiTV‬ – YouTube, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLl2QP0yeNU
12. Why do girls delete all their insta posts in the AM setup : r/Arrangedmarriage – Reddit, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Arrangedmarriage/comments/1kj1auo/why_do_girls_delete_all_their_insta_posts_in_the/
13. From ‘Locking In’ To ‘Aura Farming’: 13 Gen Z Terms That Dominated 2025 | Herzindagi, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://www.herzindagi.com/society-culture/from-locking-in-to-aura-farming-gen-z-terms-that-dominated-2025-article-1049442
14. The Rise of ‘Posting Zero’: Gen Z’s Quiet Rebellion Against Content Overload | Herzindagi, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://www.herzindagi.com/society-culture/the-rise-of-posting-zero-gen-zs-quiet-rebellion-against-content-overload-article-1049399
15. Why We Post Less on Social Media but Scroll More | MEXC News, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://www.mexc.co/en-IN/news/212601
16. Why teenagers nowadays don’t post on Instagram? – Reddit, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Instagram/comments/184dtau/why_teenagers_nowadays_dont_post_on_instagram/
17. What Is Vibe Coding; The Collins’ Word Of The Year 2025? – ED Times, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://edtimes.in/what-is-vibe-coding-the-collins-word-of-the-year-2025/
18. For guys: Is it okay with you if your girlfriend does a soft launch on social media for a year? – Reddit, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/TanongLang/comments/1mfgsp8/for_guys_okay_lang_ba_sa_inyo_na_soft_launch_muna/?tl=en
19. Engagement Soft Launch and Marriage Hard Launch, Explained – Brides, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://www.brides.com/soft-launch-engagement-hard-launch-marriage-trend-8775244
20. The “Soft Launch”: The Psychology Behind Why We Now Date “in Private” | Maclynn US, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://maclynninternational.us/blog/the-soft-launch-the-psychology-behind-why-we-now-date-in-private/
21. What You Should Know About Ghost Followers on Instagram – Kicksta, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://kicksta.co/blog/ghost-followers-on-instagram
22. LURKER – The Belcourt Theatre, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://www.belcourt.org/films/lurker/
23. Capturing on Kodak 16mm film, DP Pat Scola, ASC created a warm, timeless look for director Alex Russell’s celebrity-obsessed ‘Lurker’, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://www.kodak.com/en/motion/blog-post/lurker/
24. Meta Shares Tips on Using Instagram Notes to Build Connection …, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://influencermarketinghub.com/meta-tips-on-using-instagram-notes/
25. 500+ One-Word Instagram Captions | From Sassy to Classy – Dubs.io, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://dubs.io/blog/one-word-instagram-captions
26. 120 Aesthetic Bio For Instagram Ideas To Make Your Profile Pop! – HitPaw Online Toolbox, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://online.hitpaw.com/learn/aesthetic-bio-for-instagram.html
27. Instagram Marketing: How to Form Your Strategy in 2025 – Buffer, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://buffer.com/resources/instagram-marketing/
28. How to Check Fake Followers on Instagram Before You Pay for a Collab – IQFluence, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://iqfluence.io/public/blog/how-to-check-fake-followers-on-instagram
29. Conchological delight and a return to real life. Remember that? | Lucy Mangan, accessed on December 10, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/nov/28/conchological-delight-and-a-return-to-real-life-remember-that