The Submerged Spire: An Evidence-Based History of the Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple of Varanasi

The Submerged Spire: An Evidence-Based History of the Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple of Varanasi

The Enigma of the Leaning Temple

Along the sacred riverfront of Varanasi, amidst the eighty-four ghats that form the spiritual artery of the city, stands a structure of profound and perplexing beauty: the Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple. Located at the edge of the famed Manikarnika Ghat, the temple presents a dramatic spectacle. It leans at a severe nine-degree angle, its stone spire tilting precariously towards the northwest, and for most of the year, its sanctum sanctorum lies submerged beneath the holy waters of the Ganga.1 This haunting image of a half-drowned, leaning tower has made it one of the most photographed, yet least understood, landmarks in this ancient city.

The temple invariably invites comparison to the world-famous Leaning Tower of Pisa. Yet, the parallel is more striking for its contrast than its similarity. The Ratneshwar Temple’s incline is more than double that of its Italian counterpart, which currently leans at approximately four degrees.5 Despite this remarkable feat of precarious survival, the temple remains a relative enigma, largely unknown beyond the confines of Varanasi and the circles of intrepid travellers and photographers who capture its melancholic beauty.8

Its identity is as fluid as the river that embraces it. To locals, it is known by several names, each hinting at a different layer of its story. It is the Ratneshwar Mahadev, a temple dedicated to Lord Shiva. It is the Kashi Karvat, a descriptive name meaning “the Leaning Temple of Kashi” (the ancient name for Varanasi).2 And most evocatively, it is called Matri-rin Mahadev, or “the Temple of the Mother’s Debt,” a name rooted in a powerful local legend that seeks to explain its curious condition through a tale of filial piety and a mother’s curse.11

These overlapping names and narratives create a complex tapestry of myth and history. While the legends provide a rich cultural context, they obscure a more fascinating and evidence-based story. This report seeks to move beyond the pervasive myths to construct a history of the Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple grounded in verifiable evidence. By examining colonial-era records, architectural analysis, geological principles, and historical accounts, this investigation will unravel the mysteries of the temple’s origins, its unique and seemingly self-destructive design, the scientific reasons for its dramatic tilt, and its enduring cultural significance in the sacred landscape of Varanasi.

Unravelling a Contested History

The origins of the Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple are shrouded in a fog of conflicting narratives, pitting deeply entrenched local legends against the drier, but more verifiable, evidence found in historical records. To understand the temple, one must first navigate these competing timelines, which reveal as much about the nature of historical memory as they do about the temple itself.

The Mists of Legend: Oral Traditions and Priestly Claims

The most pervasive and popular origin story, passed down through generations of local priests and residents, places the temple’s construction approximately 500 years ago, during the 16th or early 17th century.3 According to this legend, the temple was built by an unnamed, devoted servant of Raja Man Singh of Amer, a powerful noble in the court of the Mughal emperor Akbar. The servant erected the magnificent structure as a tribute to his mother, Ratna Bai.14 Upon its completion, he is said to have proudly boasted that he had finally repaid his debt (rin) to his mother (matri). In Hindu culture, the debt to one’s mother is considered eternal and unrepayable. As a result of this hubris, the mother cursed the temple, causing it to lean, forever serving as a physical reminder of this immutable moral law. It is this powerful narrative that gives the temple its alternative name, Matri-rin Mahadev.12

A second, slightly different legend also circulates, shifting the timeline to the late 18th century. In this version, the temple was built by a female servant of the celebrated Maratha queen Ahilya Bai Holkar of Indore, who was a prolific builder of temples and ghats throughout India, including in Varanasi.14 This servant, also named Ratna Bai, named the temple after herself. Queen Ahilya Bai, angered by what she perceived as an act of vanity—a servant attaching her own name to a sacred structure—cursed the temple, causing it to lean and ensuring no worship could ever properly be performed there.3

These stories, while compelling, lack any direct historical or archaeological evidence. Their endurance speaks to the power of folklore to provide a satisfying, morally resonant explanation for an otherwise inexplicable physical phenomenon. They anchor the temple’s strange condition in a timeless lesson about humility and the sanctity of the maternal bond.

The Weight of Evidence: 19th-Century Records and Scholarly Attributions

In stark contrast to these centuries-old legends, the available documentary evidence firmly places the temple’s construction in the 19th century. The most definitive proof comes from city revenue records from the colonial period, which state that the temple was constructed between the years 1825 and 1830.2 This administrative record provides a clear and specific timeframe that directly contradicts the “500 years ago” claim of the oral traditions.

This 19th-century dating is further supported by a variety of scholarly attributions, which, although disagreeing on the specific patron, all point to the same general era. Some sources credit the construction to Queen Baija Bai of Gwalior, a powerful regent of the Scindia dynasty during the early 19th century.2 Another claim, put forth by Dr Ratnesh Varma of the District Cultural Committee, attributes the temple to the royal family of Amethi, suggesting a slightly later construction date of 1857.2

Crucial corroborating evidence comes from the work of James Prinsep, a brilliant English scholar and antiquarian who served as the assay master at the Banaras Mint from 1820 to 1830. During his time in the city, Prinsep created a series of detailed drawings and notes documenting its architecture and life. His illustrations from this period clearly depict the Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple, confirming its existence during the 1820s and lending significant weight to the 1825-1830 construction date found in the revenue records.10

The stark discrepancy between the folk memory of a 16th-century origin and the documented reality of a 19th-century construction is revealing. It suggests a process of “mythologising” in which a community, faced with a remarkable and unsettling structure, retrospectively creates a more ancient and profound backstory for it. The narrative of the “mother’s debt” provides a powerful why for the temple’s lean, an explanation that is culturally and emotionally more satisfying than the mundane administrative record of when it was built. The temple’s history is thus a fascinating case study in the tension between official documentation and the living, evolving nature of cultural memory.

Table 1: A Comparative Chronology of the Ratneshwar Temple’s Origins

To clarify these conflicting accounts, the following table organises the various claims regarding the temple’s origins, distinguishing between documented evidence, scholarly theory, and oral tradition.

Proposed Builder/PatronProposed TimeframeSource/Nature of ClaimSupporting Sources
Servant of Raja Man Singhc. 16th-17th CenturyLocal Legend / Priests’ Oral History12
Servant of Ahilya Bai Holkarc. Late 18th CenturyLocal Legend8
Queen Baija Bai of Gwalior19th CenturyScholarly Attribution2
Amethi Royal Family1857Scholarly Attribution (Dr Ratnesh Varma)2
Official Documentation1825-1830City Revenue Records2

An Architectural Anomaly on the Ganga

Beyond its contested history, the Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple is an architectural marvel, not only for its classical form but for the audacious and baffling choices made in its siting and construction. It represents a profound departure from the established architectural norms of the Varanasi ghats.

Classical Form in a Perilous Place

Architecturally, the temple is a fine example of the classical North Indian Nagara style.2 Its most prominent feature is the tall, curvilinear spire, or shikhara, which rises above the sanctum sanctorum. Attached to this is the entrance hall, or mandapa, which has been identified as being of the phamsana type—a pyramidal roof composed of multiple horizontal slabs.5 The entire structure stands approximately 12 to 13 meters tall, a modest height that has often been exaggerated in online accounts claiming it to be over 70 meters.5 Despite being subjected to the relentless cycle of submergence and exposure for nearly two centuries, the temple’s stone carvings remain in remarkably good condition, a testament to the quality of its original craftsmanship.11

The Intentional Submergence

The most radical and enigmatic feature of the temple’s design is its location. Unlike virtually every other temple in Varanasi, which is built on high plinths and platforms to protect them from the Ganga’s annual monsoon floods, the Ratneshwar Temple was constructed at an exceptionally low level, right at the water’s edge.2 This placement ensures that its sanctum sanctorum, the garbhagriha, is completely submerged for the majority of the year.5 During the height of the monsoon, the river’s waters can swell to engulf much of the structure, sometimes reaching as high as the shikhara itself.2

This was not an engineering miscalculation. The construction, dated to the late 1820s, would have taken at least a year and a half to complete, meaning the builders would have witnessed at least one full monsoon cycle.24 They would have been acutely aware of the river’s flood levels. The conclusion is inescapable: the submergence of the temple’s sanctum was a known and accepted, if not intended, outcome of its design.2

This deliberate choice to build a temple destined for seasonal inundation challenges the fundamental principles of sacred architecture, which typically prioritise permanence and the safeguarding of the deity from natural forces. Instead of resisting the power of the Ganga, the architect of the Ratneshwar Temple chose to embrace it. This suggests a profound theological statement. In Hindu cosmology, both Lord Shiva and the goddess Ganga are immensely powerful and deeply interconnected deities. By placing the Shiva Linga—the aniconic representation of the god—in a sanctum designed to be flooded by the river, the temple creates a state of perpetual ritual immersion. The goddess Ganga herself performs a constant abhishekam, or ritual bathing, of the deity. This transforms the temple from a static structure into a dynamic site of continuous worship, a place where two great cosmic forces are brought into a unique and permanent union.

The Science of the Slant

While the legends attribute the temple’s nine-degree tilt to a mother’s curse, the scientific and historical evidence points to a far more terrestrial cause: the unstable geology of the riverbank and a structural failure that occurred long after the temple was built.

A Recent Phenomenon: The Photographic Record

The most crucial piece of evidence in demystifying the temple’s lean comes from early photography. Multiple photographs taken of the Manikarnika Ghat area in the 1860s clearly show the Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple standing perfectly upright.8 This photographic record is irrefutable proof that the tilt was not part of the original design, nor did it occur immediately after its construction in the late 1820s.

The lean is a more recent development. By comparing these early images with photographs from the 20th century and the present day, it becomes clear that the subsidence began sometime after the 1860s and likely progressed over several decades.9 The dramatic tilt that defines the temple today is a feature that is little more than a century old, not a primordial curse from a distant past.

The Unstable Ghat: Geological and Structural Causes

The scientific consensus attributes the temple’s tilt to a combination of geological and structural factors, all stemming from its perilous proximity to the powerful river.

  1. Defective Foundation: The primary cause lies beneath the surface. The entire western bank of the Ganga in Varanasi is composed of deep layers of alluvial silt deposited by the river over millennia.27 This material is inherently unstable and prone to compaction and shifting, especially when saturated with water. The temple was built upon this weak and unreliable foundation, which was ultimately incapable of supporting the immense weight of the stone structure over time.11
  2. Fluvial Geodynamics: The Ganga is a dynamic and powerful force. The constant flow of the river, and especially the immense hydraulic pressure exerted during the annual monsoon floods, places enormous stress on the riverbank. This continuous pressure causes soil erosion at the base of the ghats, gradually undermining the foundations of any structures built upon them.15 Over decades, this process of “undermining” would have relentlessly weakened the ground beneath the Ratneshwar Temple.
  3. Ghat Collapse: A specific and highly plausible theory is that the section of the stone ghat on which the temple was built eventually gave way. Unable to bear the structure’s weight on the water-logged, eroded silt, the ghat itself likely subsided or collapsed, causing the temple to tilt backward (to the north-west), away from the river.7 This theory is supported by the fact that the ghats of Varanasi have been constantly rebuilt and renovated throughout history, precisely because of such collapses.28

The temple’s condition is not, therefore, a unique anomaly. Historical paintings and records from the 19th century depict several other leaning or partially collapsed temples along the riverfront.9 The Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple is simply the most dramatic and famous “lone survivor” of this recurring geological and engineering challenge.22 Its precarious state serves as a powerful physical testament to the dynamic and often destructive interplay between human ambition and the formidable natural environment of the Ganga.

A Drowned Deity: Worship, Ritual, and Modern Identity

The temple’s extraordinary physical state—both leaning and submerged—has profoundly shaped its spiritual life and its role in the cultural landscape of modern Varanasi. It exists in a fascinating duality: as a challenging, almost inaccessible place of active worship, and as a potent, easily consumed visual icon.

The Challenge of Worship

For most of the year, typically for eight to ten months, the temple’s garbhagriha is completely inaccessible, buried under several feet of water and silt.2 This has led to conflicting accounts of its ritual life. Some local traditions, often tied to the legend of Ahilya Bai’s curse, maintain that no worship (puja) is ever performed at the temple.17

However, historical and contemporary evidence tells a story of remarkable devotional persistence. James Prinsep, writing in the 1820s, noted that when the temple entrance was flooded, the priest would dive into the murky water to perform the daily rituals inside the submerged sanctum.8 This incredible act of faith demonstrates that from its earliest days, devotees found ways to overcome the temple’s inherent challenges.

This tradition of perseverance continues today, albeit in a modified form. During the peak of the dry summer season, typically in May and June, the Ganga’s water level recedes enough to expose the temple’s entrance.11 During this brief window, local devotees and volunteers undertake the laborious task of clearing out the tons of accumulated mud, sand, and debris that fill the sanctum.32 Only after this intense cleaning effort can worship be performed for a few short weeks before the monsoon rains return and the river once again reclaims the shrine.11

From Sacred Site to Photographic Icon

While its function as an active ritual space is seasonal and arduous, the temple’s role as a visual symbol of Varanasi has become dominant. Its dramatic tilt and its poignant state of partial submergence have made it one of the most photographed landmarks in the city.1 For tourists, photographers, and pilgrims alike, the image of the leaning temple has become iconic. It powerfully encapsulates the city’s perceived character: ancient, resilient, mysterious, and in a constant, intimate dialogue with the sacred river.

This has created a modern paradox. The temple’s physical “flaws”—the dangerous lean and the impractical submergence—have become its greatest cultural assets in an age of visual media. Its fame and survival in the global consciousness are now tied more to its “Instagrammability” than to its daily sanctity. The compelling story of the diving priests and the annual cleaning ritual adds to its romantic allure, but few visitors ever witness or participate in these living traditions. The temple’s primary function has subtly shifted from a space of religious practice to an object of aesthetic contemplation, a symbol whose visual power has, for many, overshadowed its original purpose.

The Future of the Leaning Temple: Preservation and Peril

The Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple exists in a state of precarious equilibrium. While it has withstood the forces of the Ganga for nearly two centuries, its long-term survival is by no means guaranteed. It faces ongoing threats, and the approach to its conservation has been fragmented and incidental rather than direct and strategic.

A Precarious State

Despite its circumstances, the temple is often described as being remarkably “well-preserved”.2 However, it remains vulnerable to both gradual decay and sudden damage. A stark reminder of this vulnerability occurred in 2015, when a lightning strike hit the top of the shikhara, shattering a portion of the stonework.12 According to reports, a local group of artists attempted to organise a restoration, but they received no support from the government, and the broken pieces of the spire were eventually lost to the river.24 This incident highlights the temple’s exposure to the elements and the lack of a rapid, dedicated response mechanism for its care.

A Fragmented Approach to Conservation

There is a notable absence of any specific, long-term conservation plan for the Ratneshwar Temple from official heritage bodies like the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).15 The research for this report found no dedicated ASI studies or preservation projects focused solely on this unique structure.

Instead, the temple’s future has become entwined with two much larger, politically significant urban renewal projects transforming the Varanasi riverfront.

  1. The Kashi Vishwanath Dham Project: In 2019, as part of the massive redevelopment of the Kashi Vishwanath Temple corridor, a list was released of approximately 30 rediscovered or historically significant temples that would be restored and conserved. The Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple was included on this list.33
  2. The Redevelopment of Manikarnika Ghat: More recently, plans for the comprehensive redevelopment and modernisation of Manikarnika Ghat were announced. These plans explicitly mention the “beautification of Manikarnika Kund, Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple, and other surrounding areas” as part of the project’s scope.34

This approach can be described as “preservation by inclusion.” The temple stands to benefit from the resources and attention brought by these massive infrastructure projects. However, this approach also carries significant risks. The primary focus of these larger projects is on improving pilgrim access, modernising facilities, and beautifying the main sites. The Ratneshwar Temple is a peripheral element in these grand schemes. The published plans speak of “restoration” and “beautification” but offer no specific details on how the complex geotechnical and structural engineering challenges at the heart of the temple’s problem—its unstable, waterlogged foundation—will be addressed. There is a tangible risk that any intervention will be merely cosmetic, repairing superficial damage like that from the lightning strike, while leaving the root cause of the tilt unaddressed. The very feature that makes the temple an icon could be preserved for its touristic value, while the underlying instability that threatens its eventual collapse continues to be ignored.

Conclusion

The Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple of Varanasi is far more than a curious anomaly or India’s answer to the Tower of Pisa. An analysis grounded in historical and scientific evidence reveals it to be a remarkable 19th-century structure, not an ancient, cursed monument. Its story is not one of mythic retribution, but of a bold and unconventional architectural vision meeting the formidable geological realities of the Ganga riverfront. The temple’s builders made a conscious choice to place it in the river’s embrace, creating a dynamic ritual space of perpetual immersion. Its subsequent, dramatic tilt is a direct consequence of this decision, a testament to the unstable silt foundation and the relentless erosive power of the river—a fate shared by other, now-vanished temples along the ghats.

Today, the temple embodies a complex modern duality. It remains a site of profound, if seasonal, devotion, where faith is expressed through the arduous labour of clearing a path to a drowned deity. Simultaneously, it has become a global icon, its precarious beauty captured in countless photographs, symbolising the timeless and resilient spirit of Varanasi.

The Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple stands as a powerful metaphor. It is a monument to devotional creativity, a case study in the geodynamics of a great river, a lesson in the making of historical myth, and a pressing challenge for heritage conservation. Its leaning spire, half-sunk in the sacred waters, is an enduring and potent symbol of faith’s resilience in the face of impermanence, a silent testament to the enduring dialogue between the eternal and the ephemeral on the banks of the Ganga.

Disclaimer

This report is a comprehensive synthesis of publicly available information, including historical documents, scholarly analyses, media reports, and academic papers. The information presented is, at times, contradictory, particularly concerning the temple’s original patronage and the exact nature of worship. This report aims to present these different perspectives factually. Mythological and legendary accounts are included for their cultural and historical significance and are distinguished from verifiable evidence. The analysis and interpretations represent the expert assessment of the author based on the provided research materials.

References

  1. Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple, Timings, History & How to Reach – YatraDham.Org, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://blog.yatradham.org/ratneshwar-mahadev-temple-varanasi/
  2. Ratneshwar Mahadev Mandir – Guide Varanasi, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://guidevaranasi.com/ratneshwar-mahadev-mandir/
  3. Ratneshwar Mahadev temple – Wikipedia, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratneshwar_Mahadev_temple
  4. 49 Ratneshwar Royalty-Free Images, Stock Photos & Pictures – Shutterstock, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://www.shutterstock.com/search/ratneshwar
  5. Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple Is A Confluence Of History And …, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://traveltriangle.com/blog/ratneshwar-mahadev-temple/
  6. Leaning Temple of Varanasi beats the Leaning Tower of Pisa, this is how – Times of India, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/travel/destinations/leaning-temple-of-varanasi-beats-the-leaning-tower-of-pisa-this-is-how/articleshow/77548716.cms
  7. Fact Check: Varanasis Ratneshwar Temple Leans More Than Tower Of Pisa?, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://thelogicalindian.com/ratneshwar-temple-leaning-tower-pisa-varanasi-lean-22847/
  8. Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple that leans more than the Leaning Tower of Pisa, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/etimes/trending/ratneshwar-mahadev-temple-that-leans-more-than-the-leaning-tower-of-pisa/articleshow/113296497.cms
  9. Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple: the enigma of Varanasi – NewsBharati, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://www.newsbharati.com/Encyc/2022/1/29/Ratneshwar-Mahadev-Temple-the-enigma-of-Varanasi.html
  10. Ratneswar Mahadev Temple, Varanasi : A Historical & Architectural context, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://indiantempless.in/2025/07/01/ratneswar-mahadev-temple-varanasi-a-historical-architectural-context/
  11. Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple, Varanasi – History, Location | Optima Travels, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://www.optimatravels.com/varanasi-uttar-pradesh/ratneshwar-mahadev-temple-varanasi-uttar-pradesh-india.aspx
  12. Ratneshwar Mahadev temple,Darshan Information, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://www.pilgrimaide.com/blog/Ratneshwar-Mahadev-temple
  13. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratneshwar_Mahadev_temple#:~:text=around%2013%20m-,History,Bai%20about%20500%20years%20ago.
  14. The ‘Leaning Temple of Varanasi’ – Peepul Tree, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://www.peepultree.world/livehistoryindia/story/monuments/leaning-temple-varanasi
  15. The Leaning Gem of Varanasi: Unveiling the Ratneshwar Mahadeva …, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://medium.com/@thefolkstories/the-leaning-gem-of-varanasi-unveiling-the-ratneshwar-mahadeva-temples-story-aac580f788e0
  16. Ratneshwar: The leaning temple of India | Travel News, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://www.indiatvnews.com/lifestyle/travel/ratneshwar-the-leaning-temple-of-india-amazing-facts-varanasi-ghat-photos-2022-05-17-777233
  17. Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple, Scindia Ghat, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh – sahasa.in, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://sahasa.in/2021/07/29/ratneshwar-mahadev-temple-scindia-ghat-varanasi-uttar-pradesh/
  18. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratneshwar_Mahadev_temple#:~:text=The%20actual%20time%20of%20construction,constructed%20from%201825%20to%201830.
  19. Ratneshwar Mahadev temple – Wikiwand, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Ratneshwar_Mahadev_temple
  20. Leaning Temple Of India: Decoding Ratneshwar Mahadev Temple In Varanasi, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://www.outlooktraveller.com/experiences/heritage/ratneshwar-mahadev-temple-leaning-india
  21. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratneshwar_Mahadev_temple#:~:text=It%20was%20built%20by%20Aman,at%20a%20very%20low%20level.
  22. Ratneshwar Mahadev – The Leaning Temple of Banaras – Kevin Standage, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://kevinstandagephotography.wordpress.com/2020/05/16/ratneshwar-mahadev-kashi-karvat-banaras-varanasi/
  23. Ratneshwar Mahadeva Temple at Varanasi, India. The temple also has a lean of 9degrees to the back as it is sinking into th ground. : r/submechanophobia – Reddit, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/submechanophobia/comments/k1wmi1/ratneshwar_mahadeva_temple_at_varanasi_india_the/
  24. Ratneshwar Mahadev – The Leaning Temple Of Kashi – Varanasi Guru, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://www.varanasiguru.com/ratneshwar-mahadev-temple/
  25. Varanasi’s Ratneshwar Temple Leans More Than Italy’s Pisa Tower And Is Even Taller Than It! | Curly Tales, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://curlytales.com/varanasi-ratneshwar-temple-leans-more-than-italys-pisa-tower-and-is-even-taller-than-it/
  26. I am speculating that there were/are more leaning temples on Ghats of Varanasi like Ratneswar temple, any information? ( More detail below) Stuck in a paradox right now : r/IndianHistory – Reddit, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianHistory/comments/1akxblv/i_am_speculating_that_there_wereare_more_leaning/
  27. Iconic Riverfront of the Historic City of Varanasi – UNESCO World Heritage Centre, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/6526/
  28. People of Varanasi, I need help; Questions regarding the disappeared leaning temples of Ghats : r/uttarpradesh – Reddit, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/uttarpradesh/comments/1akwm25/people_of_varanasi_i_need_help_questions/
  29. Ganga Ghat | District Varanasi, Government of Uttar Pradesh | India, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://varanasi.nic.in/tourist-place/ganga-ghat/
  30. Varanasi: Ancient Ratneshwar Mahadev shrine submerged in Ganga, keeps devotees at bay – ETV Bharat, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://www.etvbharat.com/english/bharat/ratneshwar-mahadev-temple-submerged-in-water-ganges-at-manikarnika-ghat-in-kashi/na20220727144800741741567
  31. Ratneshwar Temple, UP: Leaning Temple of Varanasi – India Chalk, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://indiachalk.com/ratneshwar-temple-up-leaning-temple-of-varanasi/
  32. Varanasi: Ancient Ratneshwar Mahadev Shrine Submerged in Ganga, Keeps Devotees at Bay – YouTube, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRxut-_JQjA
  33. Varanasi’s Kashi Vishwanath Dham project to restore 30 rediscovered ancient temples; Check the list – Travel & Tourism News | The Financial Express, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://www.financialexpress.com/life/travel-tourism-varanasis-kashi-vishwanath-dham-project-to-restore-30-rediscovered-ancient-temples-check-list-1800714/
  34. Redevlopment of Manikarnika Ghat – Kashi, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://kashi.gov.in/project-details/redevlopment-of-manikarnika-ghat
  35. Untitled – Invest UP, accessed on October 17, 2025, https://invest.up.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Paress-release-03072023-02.pdf

Author

Comments

Scroll to Top