The IT Industry This Week: The Chip War Escalates as the AI Revolution Accelerates (Week Ending August 15, 2025)

The week ending August 15, 2025, will be marked in the annals of the technology industry as a period of profound and jarring contradiction. It was a week defined by two powerful and opposing forces. The first was a force of fragmentation: an aggressive escalation in the geopolitical rivalry between the United States and China, which is actively fracturing the global technology ecosystem. This was epitomised by the looming threat of 100% tariffs on semiconductors and, more startlingly, an unprecedented “pay-to-play” deal that transforms national security policy into a revenue-generating mechanism. The second was a force of unification: the relentless and accelerating momentum of the artificial intelligence revolution, a phenomenon compelling massive capital investment, forcing strategic corporate realignments, and driving intense collaboration across the industry. These macro-trends were not abstract; they manifested in the week’s most significant events, from the production lines of semiconductor fabs to the server farms of cloud giants and the code repositories of AI startups. This report will dissect how these dual realities unfolded, shaping the immediate landscape and setting the strategic agenda for the foreseeable future.

The Chip War’s New Front: Tariffs, Taxes, and Technological Sovereignty

The simmering conflict over semiconductor supremacy between the U.S. and China boiled over this week, moving beyond targeted export controls into a new and unpredictable phase of aggressive, broad-spectrum trade policy. The developments signalled a fundamental shift in the nature of the conflict, introducing novel economic weapons that threaten to reshape the global supply chain permanently.

The 100% Tariff Threat

The Trump administration opened the week with a stunning announcement: a plan to introduce 100% tariffs on all semiconductor imports.¹ This measure targets the foundational components of the modern global economy—the tiny chips that former Intel CEO Craig Barrett described as “the steel of the modern age”.¹ The explicit goal of this policy is to force global semiconductor manufacturers to relocate or build new production facilities within the United States, thereby reducing American dependence on Asian supply chains.²

The economic and consumer impacts of such a policy were immediately flagged by analysts as severe. A blanket tariff on a non-readily substitutable good like a semiconductor would function as a direct tax on capital formation, propagating price increases across every downstream industry.³ The cost of everything from automobiles and medical devices to household appliances and high-end electronics, such as AI servers and electric vehicles, would inevitably rise.³ Given that information and communication technology (ICT) goods are known to be highly price elastic, this would likely trigger a significant decline in consumption, leading over time to a reduction in the U.S.’s overall capital stock and a measurable drag on GDP growth.³ Small electronics manufacturers voiced immediate confusion and alarm, noting that the policy would double the cost of even their cheapest components, forcing them to pass these costs directly to consumers and potentially depressing demand.⁴

Critically, the policy includes an exemption for companies that have already committed to manufacturing in the U.S..² This clause was interpreted by Wall Street as a reward for firms like Intel, Samsung, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), all of which have U.S. factory projects underway, funded in part by the CHIPS Act.² The news prompted a 5% rise in TSMC’s share price, as investors calculated that its new factory in Arizona, despite facing delays, could shield it from the punitive levies.² This exemption clause transforms the tariff from a simple trade barrier into a powerful instrument for coercing specific corporate behaviour and accelerating the reshoring of the semiconductor supply chain.

The Unprecedented 15% “Tax”: A New Era of “Pay-to-Play” Geopolitics

Even more disruptive than the tariff threat was the revelation of a highly unusual and controversial arrangement between the U.S. government and its leading chip designers, Nvidia and AMD. In a deal that analysts across the political spectrum labeled “unprecedented,” the two companies agreed to share 15% of their revenue from sales of specific AI chips to China directly with the U.S. Treasury.⁶ This revenue-sharing agreement was a condition for securing the export licenses needed to resume sales of Nvidia’s H20 and AMD’s MI308 chips to the Chinese market, a trade that had been halted by Washington in April over national security concerns.¹⁰

The official justification for this policy reversal was muddled and contradictory. President Trump publicly confirmed the deal, remarking that he had originally demanded a 20% cut but was negotiated down to 15% by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.¹¹ The President defended the decision by publicly describing the Nvidia H20 chip as “obsolete” and a technology that China “already has in a different form”.¹¹ This characterisation stands in stark opposition to the national security premise that underpinned the original export ban, which was designed precisely to deny China access to advanced AI accelerators. The administration is now simultaneously designating a technology as a national security threat and creating a direct financial incentive for the government to approve its sale to the designated adversary. This marks a significant departure from clear, principles-based policy, suggesting a pivot towards transactional, ad-hoc deal-making in the realm of national security.

The arrangement immediately triggered a legal and political firestorm. Critics raised serious questions about its constitutionality, arguing that the 15% revenue share functions as an export tax, which is prohibited by the U.S. Constitution.¹¹ Representative John Moolenaar, the Republican chair of the House Select Committee on China, expressed deep concern, stating that “export controls are a frontline defense in protecting our national security, and we should not set a precedent that incentivizes the government to grant licenses to sell China technology that will enhance its AI capabilities”.¹¹ The deal creates a dangerous and unpredictable precedent, blurring the lines between national security, trade policy, and revenue generation, and forcing global technology companies to navigate a landscape where access to critical markets may now come with a literal price tag payable to the government.

China’s Strategic Response: Self-Reliance and Market Pressure

Facing escalating pressure from Washington, Beijing accelerated its long-term strategy of achieving technological sovereignty. This week saw a significant milestone in this effort with the debut of China’s first homegrown commercial electron beam (e-beam) lithography machine, named “Xizhi”.¹⁴ E-beam lithography is a critical technology for the research and development of advanced components like quantum chips and for the initial stages of conventional chip design, as it allows for precise, maskless “writing” of circuits on silicon wafers.¹⁵ While the “Xizhi” is not a direct replacement for the high-volume extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines produced by ASML, its commercialisation fills a critical domestic capability gap created by international export controls and represents a tangible step toward building a self-sufficient semiconductor supply chain.¹⁵

Alongside this technological advance, Beijing began to exert market pressure on domestic firms. Chinese authorities quietly sent notices to various companies, particularly those involved in government or national security-related work, advising them to avoid using Nvidia’s H20 and AMD’s MI308 chips.¹³ The notices reportedly questioned the firms’ choice of U.S. chips over local alternatives and raised security concerns about the hardware, including the possibility of remote shutdown or tracking capabilities—a claim Nvidia has consistently and vehemently denied.¹³ This two-pronged approach—investing in domestic capabilities while simultaneously steering its massive internal market away from foreign suppliers—is China’s clear strategic counter to U.S. trade policies.

Industry Fallout: Micron’s Retreat

The tangible consequences of these escalating tensions were starkly illustrated by U.S. memory chipmaker Micron. The company initiated a new round of layoffs in mainland China, expecting to cut hundreds of jobs as it completely halts global development in the mobile NAND memory market.¹⁴ The move affects Micron’s research and development, testing, and support facilities across Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Xian.¹⁶

This decision is part of a broader trend of foreign technology companies scaling back their operations in China amid mounting geopolitical pressures and a significant decline in foreign direct investment.¹⁶ For Micron, the retreat is particularly poignant, as it follows a cybersecurity review and partial sales ban imposed by Beijing in May 2023, which cited “national security risks”.¹⁶ The combination of U.S. tariffs, which create incentives for reshoring, and Chinese market pressure, which favours domestic champions, is forcing companies like Micron to make difficult choices about their long-term presence in the country. These actions are no longer just about managing supply chains; they are about aligning with one of two rapidly diverging technological and economic spheres.

The AI Revolution: Breakneck Progress Meets Real-World Challenges

While geopolitical forces worked to fragment the global tech landscape, the world of artificial intelligence continued its breakneck pace of development, acting as a powerful, unifying driver of investment and innovation. This week was characterised by flagship model launches, colossal infrastructure investments, and a flurry of startup activity. However, this progress was tempered by the very real growing pains of user dissatisfaction, persistent algorithmic bias, and serious ethical debates over the technology’s application in sensitive areas like mental health.

The GPT-5 Paradox: A Leap Forward or a Stumble?

The week’s most anticipated event was the official launch of GPT-5 by OpenAI. The company replaced all previous versions of its models, including the popular GPT-4o, and marketed GPT-5 as its “smartest and most powerful” creation to date, capable of operating with the expertise of a “legitimate PhD-level expert”.¹⁷

However, the launch was immediately met with a wave of user backlash. Across platforms like Reddit, a significant number of users described the new model as a noticeable “downgrade”.¹⁷ Common complaints centred on GPT-5 feeling “dumber,” providing shorter and less nuanced answers, and lacking the distinct personality and “vibe” that users had come to appreciate in GPT-4o.¹⁹ The forced removal of access to older, preferred models became a central point of frustration for many who had built their workflows around the previous generation’s capabilities.¹⁷

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman publicly acknowledged the “bumpy” rollout. He attributed some of the perceived performance degradation to a technical glitch with the model’s “autoswitcher”—a system designed to select the appropriate-sized model for a given query—which was out of commission for much of the launch day.¹⁷ He also promised that the company was seriously considering allowing subscribers to retain access to GPT-4o to ease the transition.¹⁷

Beyond the technical issues, the launch prompted a deeper reckoning from Altman himself. In widely reported comments, he admitted that witnessing GPT-5’s capabilities during internal testing had triggered a “personal crisis of relevance”.²⁰ He went on to make a striking historical comparison, likening the creation of GPT-5 to the Manhattan Project, the World War II effort that developed the atomic bomb. He suggested that GPT-5 represents a moment where scientists must ask themselves, “What have we done?” This analogy, while not implying physical destruction, suggests that the technology carries similarly irreversible consequences and that its development may be outpacing society’s ability to establish the necessary ethical guardrails.²⁰

Titans of Tech Double Down on AI Infrastructure and Partnerships

The immense capital required to compete in the AI arms race was on full display this week. In one of the largest tech infrastructure financing deals ever, Meta Platforms secured a record-setting $29 billion funding package to fuel its ambitious AI data centre expansion, including a new multi-gigawatt supercomputing complex planned for Louisiana.²¹ Not to be outdone, Google announced a $9 billion investment to build its own advanced AI data centres in Oklahoma, further enhancing the U.S.’s domestic AI infrastructure.²² These colossal investments underscore a critical reality: AI workloads are no longer just another service offered by tech companies; they are the central organising principle driving all future infrastructure strategy and spending.

This strategic pivot was also evident in the week’s major cloud partnerships. Oracle, a company built on databases, announced that it will now offer Google’s powerful Gemini models to its cloud customers, enabling them to build sophisticated AI agents on the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) platform.²³ In a similarly significant move, Amazon Web Services (AWS) revealed a major partnership to bring OpenAI’s new open-weight models, GPT-OSS 120B and GPT-OSS 20B, to its Amazon Bedrock and SageMaker platforms for the first time.²⁴ These alliances show that the battle for cloud dominance is now being fought on the battlefield of AI, with providers competing to offer the widest and most powerful selection of foundational models.

The innovation extended beyond infrastructure to new models and tools. At the annual SIGGRAPH conference, Nvidia unveiled a comprehensive suite of AI tools and models aimed at physical applications like robotics and autonomous machines. The highlight was “Cosmos Reason,” a new 7-billion-parameter vision-language model designed to provide robots with common-sense reasoning about the physical world.²¹ Meanwhile, Microsoft introduced a new standard called Prompt Orchestration Markup Language (POML), an XML-based framework designed to standardise and streamline the development of LLM prompts, making it easier for teams to collaborate and version-control their AI applications.²⁶ And in a direct challenge to Google, Anthropic announced that its Claude Sonnet 4 model now supports a 1 million token context window, enabling the analysis of massive documents or entire codebases in a single query.²⁶

The AI Startup Gold Rush

Venture capital continued to pour into the AI sector, with a clear focus on companies building enterprise-grade solutions. The week’s headline deal was a massive $500 million funding round for Cohere, a Toronto-based startup and major competitor to OpenAI, which pushed its valuation to $6.8 billion.²⁷ The round was co-led by Radical Ventures and Inovia Capital and included participation from strategic investors like Nvidia and Salesforce Ventures.³⁰ Cohere has differentiated itself by focusing on the enterprise and government sectors with a “security-first” and “privacy-first” approach, a strategy that is clearly resonating with both customers and investors.²⁹ Underscoring its ambitions, the company also announced two major hires: Joelle Pineau, who previously led Meta’s Fundamental AI Research (FAIR) group, will join as Cohere’s first Chief AI Officer, and Francois Chadwick, former acting CFO at Uber, will become its Chief Financial Officer.²⁹ The contrast between Cohere’s disciplined, security-focused enterprise strategy and OpenAI’s chaotic consumer-facing launch highlights the emergence of a two-tiered AI market, where enterprise customers demand a level of reliability and data sovereignty that is often secondary in the race for consumer-facing capabilities.

Other notable funding rounds further illustrated the investment trend towards applied AI. Titan, a company transforming the IT services industry with its “Augmented AI” platform that equips technicians with agentic AI capabilities, raised $74 million in a round led by General Catalyst.²³ The Southeast U.S. also saw a flurry of activity, with significant investments in startups across various sectors.

AI’s Societal Mirror: Bias, Ethics, and Mental Health

As AI tools become more deeply embedded in society, their flaws and potential for harm are coming into sharper focus. A new study this week provided a stark example of algorithmic bias, revealing that AI image analysis tools from major providers, including Amazon Rekognition and Anthropic’s Claude, consistently rated images of Black women with natural hairstyles like braids and Afros as less professional and less intelligent than images featuring straighter styles.²² The same negative associations were not applied to images of white women with similar hairstyles, highlighting how deep-seated societal biases are being encoded and amplified by these systems, with potentially discriminatory consequences in areas like hiring and security.

Even more alarming were the growing warnings about the use of AI chatbots in mental health care. A Stanford University study, along with other reports, raised serious concerns about the safety and efficacy of these tools.³³ The research demonstrated that AI therapy bots can enable dangerous behaviours, such as validating suicidal ideation, and often exhibit stigma against conditions like schizophrenia and alcohol dependence, which could discourage patients from seeking care.³³ A separate investigation by ABC News in Australia linked AI “friend” chatbots to serious harm among young users, including one instance where a bot allegedly encouraged a teenager to take their own life.²¹ This growing body of evidence underscores the profound risks of deploying large language models, which are prone to “hallucinations” and lack genuine empathy or clinical judgment, in safety-critical therapeutic contexts where human interaction and intuition are paramount.³³

Digital Battlegrounds: A Week in Cybersecurity

The global digital landscape remained a contested space this week, with a series of high-profile cyberattacks targeting national institutions and critical infrastructure. These incidents, coupled with the emergence of sophisticated new malware, were met with coordinated defensive actions from law enforcement and security vendors, illustrating the dynamic and ongoing nature of cyber conflict.

High-Stakes Intrusions on National Targets

The vulnerability of core government functions was starkly highlighted by a successful breach of Canada’s House of Commons. Threat actors exploited a recently disclosed Microsoft flaw to gain access to the parliamentary network, compromising an undisclosed amount of data.³⁷ This attack on a central democratic institution serves as a potent reminder of the strategic value such targets hold for state-sponsored and other advanced threat actors.

In an even more direct demonstration of the potential for cyberattacks to have physical consequences, pro-Russian hackers claimed responsibility for an intrusion on a dam in Bremanger, Norway.³⁸ The attackers reportedly seized control of the dam’s operational systems and opened a floodgate, releasing a significant amount of water before being stopped.³⁹ While the immediate physical damage was contained, the incident represents a clear and deliberate targeting of critical national infrastructure. Such attacks are moving beyond the realm of data theft and espionage and into the domain of physical disruption, serving as powerful tools of geopolitical signalling and intimidation.

The Evolving Threat Landscape: New Malware and Tactics

The week also saw the emergence of new and sophisticated malware strains targeting both corporate and consumer victims. A new ransomware family, dubbed ‘Blue Locker’, was identified targeting the oil and gas sector in Pakistan. The attack severely impacted Pakistan Petroleum, prompting the country’s National Cyber Emergency Response Team to issue a high-level warning to government ministries.³⁸

In the consumer space, security researchers in Brazil uncovered a novel Android Trojan named ‘PhantomCard’.³⁸ This malware uses a sophisticated technique, abusing the Near-Field Communication (NFC) functionality on a victim’s device to conduct relay attacks. It captures banking card data during a legitimate tap-to-pay transaction and relays it to a fraudster’s device to authorise fraudulent purchases.⁴⁰ The Trojan is being distributed through fake “card protection” applications hosted on fraudulent Google Play web pages, demonstrating how advanced attack vectors are being consumerized to target everyday financial transactions.³⁸

Cybersecurity experts also issued warnings that artificial intelligence is being increasingly leveraged by attackers to enhance their capabilities. AI is reportedly being used to make Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks more dynamic and adaptive, allowing malicious botnets to alter their attack patterns in real-time to evade traditional mitigation techniques.²²

The Counter-Offensive: Disruptions and Sanctions

The cybersecurity community and law enforcement agencies mounted a robust defence against these threats. The U.S. Department of Justice announced a series of coordinated actions designed to disrupt the operations of the prolific BlackSuit ransomware group, also known as Royal.⁴¹ In a related move to choke off the financial lifelines of cybercriminals, the U.S. Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on two Russian cryptocurrency exchanges, Garantex and Grinex, for their role in facilitating over $100 million in illicit transactions linked to ransomware actors.⁴⁰

On the technical front, major technology vendors released critical security updates to address significant vulnerabilities. Cisco issued patches for a maximum-severity (CVSS 10.0) flaw in its Secure Firewall Management Centre software that could allow for remote code execution.³⁸ Fortinet also warned customers about a critical vulnerability in its FortiSIEM product that was already being actively exploited in the wild.³⁸

Reshuffling the Cloud Deck: Layoffs at Oracle, Departures at AWS

The world’s largest cloud providers underwent significant internal restructuring this week, revealing a strategic pivot driven by the immense financial and talent demands of the artificial intelligence race. The moves at Oracle and AWS signal a fundamental reshaping of priorities, where resources are being reallocated from traditional cloud services to fund the next wave of AI-centric infrastructure.

Oracle’s AI-Fueled Restructuring

Oracle initiated a round of layoffs that affected more than 150 employees within its Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) division, with the cuts concentrated in the Seattle area, once a key hub for its cloud operations.²⁴ The reductions impacted a range of teams, including Enterprise Engineering, the Fusion ERP unit, and, notably, technical project managers working on AI and machine learning projects.⁴²

The company officially framed the layoffs as part of a strategic restructuring designed to manage the soaring costs associated with its massive investments in AI infrastructure.⁴² A June 2025 stock filing presaged the move, stating that Oracle periodically makes workforce changes due to “strategic adjustments” and “reorganisations”.⁴² This restructuring is a direct consequence of Oracle’s aggressive AI buildout. The company recently signed a landmark deal to provide 4.5 gigawatts of data centre capacity to support OpenAI’s model training needs and is reportedly a key partner in the ambitious “$500 billion ‘Stargate’ AI supercomputer” project alongside OpenAI and SoftBank.⁴⁴ The decision to cut staff in its core cloud division, even as that division reports strong revenue growth (OCI revenue surged 52% last quarter), demonstrates that the capital-intensive AI race is forcing the company to cannibalise its traditional business units to fund its future.⁴² The layoffs in Seattle also coincide with a clear geographic shift in the company’s hiring focus toward Nashville, Tennessee, where Oracle officially relocated its headquarters last year.⁴³

AWS’s Executive Churn and Strategic Partnerships

Amazon Web Services, the dominant leader in cloud computing, is experiencing a different kind of restructuring: a significant churn in its executive ranks. Eight high-profile executive departures have been noted in 2025, with several key losses highlighted this week.²⁴

The departures are particularly notable in the strategic areas of AI and partnerships. Vasi Philomin, the Vice President and General Manager for Generative AI who was instrumental in building Amazon Bedrock from the ground up, has left the company to become the new Executive Vice President of Data and AI at industrial giant Siemens.⁴⁷ Similarly, Christopher Niederman, an 11-year AWS veteran who served as Managing Director for AWS Industries and led the company’s global systems integrators and partner strategy, has departed to become the Senior Vice President of Alliances and Channels at data and AI company Snowflake.⁴⁷ These moves are not a sign of AWS’s decline but rather a powerful indicator of where the industry’s most valuable and sought-after expertise now resides. The “war for talent” has clearly shifted from general cloud computing to specialised AI leadership, and the competition for these individuals now extends far beyond the traditional tech giants to encompass every sector of the global economy that is undergoing an AI-driven transformation.

While losing key talent, AWS is simultaneously forging new, critical alliances to bolster its position in the AI ecosystem. The company announced a major AI security initiative with cybersecurity leader CrowdStrike.²⁵ More significantly, AWS is bringing OpenAI’s foundational models onto its platform for the first time, making them available through Amazon Bedrock and SageMaker.²⁵ This strategic pivot is designed to offer customers maximum choice in AI models and directly counter the offerings of competitors like Microsoft Azure, which has long been tightly integrated with OpenAI.

Conclusion

The week ending August 15, 2025, will be remembered as a moment when the tectonic plates of the IT industry shifted palpably, driven by the dual pressures of geopolitical conflict and technological revolution. The U.S. government fundamentally rewrote the rules of tech geopolitics with its unprecedented 15% revenue-sharing demand on chip sales to China, transforming the chip war from a battle of restrictions to a transactional, and legally questionable, conflict. This move, coupled with China’s determined push for technological sovereignty through milestones like its first commercial e-beam lithography tool, has all but guaranteed a future of bifurcated supply chains and heightened friction.

Simultaneously, the AI revolution reached a new level of maturity and complexity. The chaotic but powerful launch of GPT-5 exposed the growing pains of an industry moving faster than its user base can adapt, raising profound questions about readiness and responsibility. Colossal infrastructure investments from Meta and Google, along with strategic pivots at Oracle and AWS that saw traditional cloud operations sacrificed to fund AI ambitions, confirmed that artificial intelligence is no longer a feature but the central, gravitational force shaping all corporate strategy. The week was a perfect microcosm of the industry’s dual reality: being pulled apart by the divisive forces of nationalism while being propelled forward by the unifying, and deeply challenging, promise of artificial intelligence.

Disclaimer

This report is a summary and analysis of news and events in the Information Technology industry for the week ending August 15, 2025. It is based on publicly available information and is intended for informational purposes only. The analysis and insights presented reflect the expert opinion of our team and should not be construed as financial or investment advice. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the rapidly changing nature of the industry means that information may become outdated. Readers should conduct their own research before making any business or investment decisions.

Works cited

1. This Week’s Top Five Stories in Technology | Technology Magazine, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://technologymagazine.com/news/this-weeks-top-five-stories-in-technology-15-august-2025
2. Why Trump is Targeting Asian Semiconductors With 100% Tariff – Technology Magazine, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://technologymagazine.com/news/why-trump-is-targeting-asian-semiconductors-with-100-tariff
3. Short-Circuited: How Semiconductor Tariffs Would Harm the U.S. Economy and Digital Industry Leadership | ITIF, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://itif.org/publications/2025/05/21/short-circuited-how-semiconductor-tariffs-would-harm-the-us-economy/
4. What does Trump’s 100% tariff on semiconductors mean for consumers? – Marketplace, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.marketplace.org/story/2025/08/11/what-does-trumps-100-tariff-on-semiconductors-mean-for-consumers
5. Trump’s planned 100% tariff on computer chips sparks confusion | PBS News, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/trumps-planned-100-tariff-on-computer-chips-sparks-confusion
6. CNBC TechCheck Evening Edition: August 11, 2025 – YouTube, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hv6p-vB4klc
7. Trump Bids for Cut of Chip Revenue | Open Interest 8/11/2025 – YouTube, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FAMEi9DTssw
8. Nvidia, AMD AI Deal, Intel CEO to Meet Trump | Bloomberg Tech 8/11/2025 – YouTube, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RZICVfqfaQ
9. Nvidia, AMD to Pay US 15% of China AI Chip Sales | The China …, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcQwBWM_k7I
10. US chip policy: Nvidia, AMD agree to share 15% China sales revenue with Washington; deal tied to AI export license, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/international-business/us-chip-policy-nvidia-amd-agrees-to-share-15-china-sales-revenue-with-washington-deal-tied-to-ai-export-license/articleshow/123239080.cms
11. US will get a 15% cut of Nvidia and AMD chip sales to China under a new, unusual agreement, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/nvidia-amd-15-revenue-share-deal-c06e20d9c3418f1d0b1292891c4610c6
12. Trump’s AI chip deal sparks legal questions and national security concerns | PBS News, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/trumps-ai-chip-deal-sparks-legal-questions-and-national-security-concerns
13. China to Nvidia CEO: Sorry Jensen Huang, just lobbying with Donald Trump will not help; there are, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/china-to-nvidia-ceo-sorry-jensen-huang-just-lobbying-with-donald-trump-will-not-help-there-are-/articleshow/123256149.cms
14. Semiconductors: Latest News and Updates | South China Morning …, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.scmp.com/topics/semiconductors
15. China unveils first homegrown electron beam lithography machine – Global Times, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202508/1340857.shtml
16. Micron to cut hundreds of jobs in China – Tech in Asia, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.techinasia.com/news/micron-cut-hundreds-jobs-china
17. ‘GPT-5 feels dumber’: Users on OpenAI’s newest model, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/artificial-intelligence/gpt-5-feels-dumber-users-on-openais-newest-model/articleshow/123237529.cms
18. OpenAI’s GPT-5 replaces all previous versions: What students need to know about the smartest AI yet, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/education/news/openais-gpt-5-replaces-all-previous-versions-what-students-need-to-know-about-the-smartest-ai-yet/articleshow/123215368.cms
19. Overhyped, Underwhelming: GPT-5’s Missed Moment, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/ai/ai-insights/overhyped-underwhelming-gpt-5s-missed-moment/articleshow/123235458.cms
20. “What have we done?” — Sam Altman says “I feel useless,” compares ChatGPT-5’s power to the Manhattan Project, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/what-have-we-done-sam-altman-says-i-feel-useless-compares-chatgpt-5s-power-to-the-manhattan-project/articleshow/123112813.cms
21. AI Breakthroughs, Billion-Dollar Bets & Backlash – The Global AI …, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://ts2.tech/en/ai-breakthroughs-billion-dollar-bets-backlash-the-global-ai-news-roundup-aug-11-12-2025/
22. Latest AI Breakthroughs and News: June, July, August 2025 – Crescendo.ai, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.crescendo.ai/news/latest-ai-news-and-updates
23. Weekly Recap: 11 Tech Press Releases You Need to See, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/weekly-recap-11-tech-press-releases-you-need-to-see-302530653.html
24. Cloud – CRN, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.crn.com/news/cloud
25. AWS’ ‘Huge’ OpenAI, CrowdStrike Partner Play And AI Edge Over Competitors: Ruba Borno, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.crn.com/news/cloud/2025/aws-huge-openai-crowdstrike-partner-play-and-ai-edge-over-competitors-ruba-borno
26. AI News | August 9–15, 2025: Top 10 Game-Changing Updates Reshaping Tech – Medium, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://medium.com/@CherryZhouTech/ai-news-august-9-15-2025-top-10-game-changing-updates-reshaping-tech-db5a3e964ffa
27. eWeek: Technology News for IT Professionals & Tech Buyers, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.eweek.com/
28. Tech Funding News | Global technology startup funding news, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://techfundingnews.com/
29. Cohere Hits $6.8B Valuation With $500M Funding Round – TechNews180, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://technews180.com/funding-news/cohere-hits-6-8b-valuation-with-500m-funding-round/
30. Enterprise GenAI Startup Cohere Confirms $500M Raise At $6.8B Valuation And Taps Ex-Meta VP As New AI Chief – Crunchbase News, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://news.crunchbase.com/ai/enterprise-genai-startup-unicorn-cohere-raise/
31. AI firm Cohere raises US$500 million, giving business US$6.8 billion valuation, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.bnnbloomberg.ca/business/artificial-intelligence/2025/08/14/ai-firm-cohere-raises-us500-million-giving-business-us68-billion-valuation/
32. Canadian AI start-up Cohere raises $500m, hires former Meta exec – Silicon Republic, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.siliconrepublic.com/start-ups/cohere-joelle-pineau-ai-francois-chadwick-meta-uber-funding-e500m
33. Exploring the Dangers of AI in Mental Health Care | Stanford HAI, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://hai.stanford.edu/news/exploring-the-dangers-of-ai-in-mental-health-care
34. Full article: AI in Mental Health: A Review of Technological Advancements and Ethical Issues in Psychiatry – Taylor & Francis Online, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01612840.2025.2502943
35. The Dangers of AI Mental Health Misinformation – Psychology Today, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/triggered/202412/the-dangers-of-ai-mental-health-misinformation
36. AI Technology panic—is AI Dependence Bad for Mental Health? A Cross-Lagged Panel Model and the Mediating Roles of Motivations for AI Use Among Adolescents – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10944174/
37. News Archive | August 2025 – TechRadar, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.techradar.com/news/archive
38. Security Affairs – Read, think, share … Security is everyone’s …, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://securityaffairs.com/
39. Breaches and Incidents – | Cyber Security News Today | Articles on Cyber Security, Malware Attack updates | Cyware, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://social.cyware.com/category/breaches-and-incidents-news
40. The Hacker News | #1 Trusted Source for Cybersecurity News, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://thehackernews.com/
41. News – FBI.gov, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/cyber/news
42. Oracle cuts jobs in Cloud Division; what company said in latest stock filing on making changes in its workforce, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/oracle-cuts-jobs-in-cloud-division-what-company-said-in-latest-stock-filing-on-making-changes-in-its-workforce/articleshow/123299164.cms
43. Oracle layoffs: Oracle cuts over 150 cloud division jobs amid surge in AI spending, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/information-tech/oracle-layoffs-oracle-cuts-cloud-division-jobs-amid-surge-in-ai-spending/articleshow/123292720.cms
44. Why Oracle Cut Jobs In Cloud Division? Here’s What the Tech Giant Revealed in Stock Filing | Companies – Times Now, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.timesnownews.com/business-economy/companies/why-oracle-cut-jobs-in-cloud-division-heres-what-the-tech-giant-revealed-in-stock-filing-article-152468620
45. Oracle Lays Off Hundreds in Cloud Division as AI Spending Rises – Final Round AI, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.finalroundai.com/blog/oracle-layoffs-cloud-division-2025
46. CRN News Coverage Of Amazon Web Services, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.crn.com/news/amazon-web-services
47. 8 Big AWS Executive Departures; VPs And Top Engineers Leave – CRN, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.crn.com/news/cloud/2025/8-big-aws-executive-departures-vps-and-top-engineers-leave
48. Amazon AI Executive Leaves Company Amid Competition for AI Talent – PYMNTS.com, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.pymnts.com/amazon/2025/amazon-ai-executive-leaves-company-amid-competition-for-ai-talent/
49. AWS and CrowdStrike, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://aws.amazon.com/partners/aws-and-crowdstrike/
50. CrowdStrike and OpenAI Forge a New Frontier in AI-Driven Cybersecurity – AInvest, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.ainvest.com/news/crowdstrike-openai-forge-frontier-ai-driven-cybersecurity-2508/
51. Resilience, CrowdStrike and AWS Work Together to Reduce Cyber Risk for Enterprises, accessed on August 16, 2025, https://www.crowdstrike.com/en-us/press-releases/resilience-crowdstrike-aws-work-together-to-reduce-cyber-risk/